4 sec in total
818 ms
3 sec
106 ms
Click here to check amazing Rifftype content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rifftype.com
Visit rifftype.comWe analyzed Rifftype.com page load time and found that the first response time was 818 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rifftype.com performance score
818 ms
232 ms
172 ms
260 ms
604 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Rifftype.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain Rifftype.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (80%)
1.5 MB
304.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Rifftype.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 863.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rifftype images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 652.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 652.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 562.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rifftype.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 562.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (94%)
65
4
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rifftype. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rifftype.com
818 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
232 ms
colorbox.css
172 ms
font-awesome.css
260 ms
front.css
604 ms
font-awesome.css
270 ms
font-awesome.css
276 ms
styles.css
255 ms
styles.css
314 ms
style.css
340 ms
style.css
345 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.css
359 ms
idangerous.swiper.css
367 ms
mb.YTVPlayer.css
396 ms
timer2.css
423 ms
mb-comingsoon.css
429 ms
animate.css
627 ms
contact-ui.css
549 ms
shortcodes.css
559 ms
pbs.css
506 ms
minimalist.css
597 ms
progressbar.css
591 ms
style.css
639 ms
css
68 ms
genericons.css
643 ms
style.css
926 ms
jquery.js
851 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
683 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
713 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
791 ms
form_validate.js
695 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.color.min.js
709 ms
widget.min.js
745 ms
core.min.js
748 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
794 ms
slider.min.js
834 ms
accordion.min.js
831 ms
sortable.min.js
941 ms
datepicker.min.js
771 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
713 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
724 ms
idangerous.swiper.js
908 ms
swfobject.js
748 ms
jquery.metadata.js
749 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
719 ms
timer.min.js
807 ms
jquery.mb-comingsoon.js
754 ms
shortcodes.js
824 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
744 ms
chart.js
722 ms
raphael.2.1.0.min.js
959 ms
css
14 ms
justgage.1.0.1.js
766 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
695 ms
pbs.min.js
679 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
693 ms
flowplayer.min.js
677 ms
pb_main.js
681 ms
buttons_styles.css
680 ms
optin_styles.css
684 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
740 ms
functions.js
737 ms
wp-embed.min.js
697 ms
Genericons.svg
166 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=
28 ms
overlay.png
97 ms
rifftype.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rifftype.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rifftype.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rifftype.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rifftype. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: