4.4 sec in total
900 ms
3.4 sec
179 ms
Welcome to rigmansafety.com homepage info - get ready to check Rigman Safety best content right away, or after learning these important things about rigmansafety.com
Rigman Safety offers you wide range of robust & reliable safety products that can be applicable for any diverse environments. It provides personal protective equipment for industries like oilfield, co...
Visit rigmansafety.comWe analyzed Rigmansafety.com page load time and found that the first response time was 900 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rigmansafety.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.3 s
0/100
10%
Value18.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.075
95/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
900 ms
28 ms
64 ms
128 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Rigmansafety.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rigmansafety.com.
Page size can be reduced by 155.5 kB (10%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rigmansafety.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rigman Safety images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rigmansafety.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (84%)
96
15
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rigman Safety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rigmansafety.com
900 ms
css
28 ms
calendar-win2k-1.css
64 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
128 ms
ajaxaddto.css
190 ms
owl.carousel.css
190 ms
owl.transitions.css
189 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
192 ms
bootstrap.min.css
257 ms
styles.css
266 ms
widgets.css
253 ms
configurableswatches.css
252 ms
style-newssubscribers.css
253 ms
custom.css
260 ms
style.css
316 ms
style.css
315 ms
font-awesome.min.css
317 ms
cat-icon.css
319 ms
megamenu.css
320 ms
megamenu_responsive.css
328 ms
styles.css
378 ms
style.css
379 ms
granada-font.css
1587 ms
design_default.css
382 ms
setting_default.css
383 ms
custom.css
391 ms
timer.css
441 ms
prototype.js
514 ms
ccard.js
446 ms
validation.js
448 ms
builder.js
454 ms
effects.js
505 ms
dragdrop.js
511 ms
controls.js
514 ms
slider.js
518 ms
js.js
571 ms
form.js
575 ms
menu.js
576 ms
translate.js
518 ms
cookies.js
458 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
516 ms
script.js
454 ms
calendar.js
458 ms
calendar-setup.js
455 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
401 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
455 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
460 ms
ajaxaddto.js
451 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
458 ms
product.js
493 ms
configurable.js
457 ms
jquery-migrate-1.0.0.js
459 ms
bootstrap.min.js
461 ms
timer.js
462 ms
imagesloaded.js
512 ms
app.js
509 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
459 ms
enquire.js
463 ms
jquery.swblog.js
460 ms
megamenu.js
512 ms
bundle.js
510 ms
sw_quickview.js
460 ms
twitterfetcher.js
458 ms
jquery.granada.js
459 ms
waypoints.min.js
505 ms
ga.js
53 ms
v2.zopim.com
65 ms
footwear.png
133 ms
logo5.png
132 ms
ajax-loader.gif
132 ms
home-page-small-banner61.jpg
136 ms
home-page-small-banner8a1.jpg
135 ms
home-page-small-banner71.jpg
131 ms
1437821333_facebook.png
135 ms
1437821340_youtube.png
136 ms
1437821345_linkedin.png
135 ms
evacuation-system.png
134 ms
head-protection.png
135 ms
eye-protection.png
134 ms
ear-protection.png
134 ms
fr-coverall.png
135 ms
coverall.png
133 ms
hand-protection.png
197 ms
respiratory-system.png
198 ms
fall-protection.png
197 ms
rescue-devices.png
196 ms
face-protection.png
197 ms
sinkinsans-400regular.woff
223 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
223 ms
granada-font.woff
219 ms
__utm.gif
74 ms
asset_composer.js
118 ms
footerbg.jpg
227 ms
esns_dark2.png
71 ms
esns_box_close.png
71 ms
esns_box_block1.png
152 ms
esns_box_button.png
152 ms
1.jpg
381 ms
5.jpg
363 ms
4.jpg
324 ms
3.jpg
388 ms
2.jpg
451 ms
print.css
65 ms
rigmansafety.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rigmansafety.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rigmansafety.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rigmansafety.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rigmansafety.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rigmansafety.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rigman Safety. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: