3.8 sec in total
289 ms
3 sec
515 ms
Click here to check amazing Riopack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riopack.com
Roto Grapher printing, cutting and converting paper, films of all kinds, rolls, sheets, printing and lining of paper, aluminum, and film.
Visit riopack.comWe analyzed Riopack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
riopack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.559
13/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
289 ms
1064 ms
197 ms
382 ms
479 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Riopack.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Riopack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 611.5 kB (29%)
2.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Riopack.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 251.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riopack needs image optimization as it can save up to 251.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 157.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 157.6 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 164.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riopack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (29%)
48
34
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riopack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riopack.com
289 ms
riopack.com
1064 ms
bootstrap.css
197 ms
font-awesome.css
382 ms
ionicon.css
479 ms
slick.css
291 ms
slick-theme.css
283 ms
magnific-popup.css
290 ms
style-ltr.css
392 ms
custom-ltr.css
385 ms
ar.png
384 ms
logo.png
522 ms
rioooo13.jpg
578 ms
riooo2.jpg
770 ms
paner333333-2.jpg
770 ms
Gravur%202.jpg
434 ms
about-circle.png
575 ms
client-05.png
512 ms
client-04.png
521 ms
Savola-300Group-Logo.png
630 ms
client-02.png
634 ms
client-01.png
680 ms
Untitled-2.jpg
681 ms
Untitled-1.jpg
734 ms
Unilever-300Logo.png
738 ms
embed
328 ms
jquery.min.js
891 ms
slick.min.js
791 ms
jquery.sticky.js
834 ms
countto.min.js
837 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
864 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
867 ms
scripts.js
887 ms
525220.jpg
1007 ms
212121288.jpg
1008 ms
2121212.jpg
1008 ms
6656.jpg
1008 ms
slider04.jpg
1008 ms
rio%20halaa.jpg
1009 ms
rio%20cristal.jpg
934 ms
rio.jpg
848 ms
riopack.jpg
972 ms
6232656.jpg
1383 ms
accreditations-brc.jpg
814 ms
UKAS.jpg
814 ms
ISO9001-and-UKAS-WEB.jpg
844 ms
ISO22000-and-UKAS-111WEB.jpg
843 ms
js
49 ms
ISO18001-and-UKAS-WEB.jpg
777 ms
bg-1.jpg
866 ms
ionicons.woff
934 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
750 ms
riopack.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
riopack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
riopack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riopack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riopack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riopack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riopack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: