Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

riscograma.ro

Riscograma

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

805 ms

riscograma.ro screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Riscograma content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riscograma.ro

Blogul lui Lucian Davidescu

Visit riscograma.ro

Key Findings

We analyzed Riscograma.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riscograma.ro performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riscograma.ro

153 ms

riscograma.ro

434 ms

standard.css

395 ms

riscograma.png

35 ms

guy-fawkes-640x360.jpg

1286 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Riscograma.ro and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Riscograma.ro.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 160.1 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Riscograma.ro main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 21.1 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 143.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riscograma needs image optimization as it can save up to 143.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 145 B

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riscograma.ro has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

62

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riscograma. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

riscograma.ro accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

riscograma.ro best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

riscograma.ro SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    RO

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riscograma.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Romanian. Our system also found out that Riscograma.ro main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riscograma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: