Tools & Wizards About Us
risewell.cn screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

risewell.cn

RISEWELL 旭佳实业

Page Load Speed

17.6 sec in total

First Response

2.4 sec

Resources Loaded

14.9 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

risewell.cn screenshot

About Website

Welcome to risewell.cn homepage info - get ready to check RISEWELL best content right away, or after learning these important things about risewell.cn

RISEWELL 旭佳实业，专注高品质储物柜、定制柜体与空间收纳解决方案。

Visit risewell.cn

Key Findings

We analyzed Risewell.cn page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 15.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

risewell.cn performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

risewell.cn

2433 ms

reset.css

653 ms

css.css

1512 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

1952 ms

js.js

885 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Risewell.cn, 14% (11 requests) were made to Bdimg.share.baidu.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Ta.sbird.xyz. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Risewell.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 285.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Risewell.cn main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 34.0 kB

  • Original 42.3 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.9 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 73.5 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RISEWELL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 147.0 kB

  • Original 390.2 kB
  • After minification 344.4 kB
  • After compression 243.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.0 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 30.9 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Risewell.cn needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (38%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

44

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RISEWELL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

risewell.cn

risewell.cn

2433 ms

reset.css

reset.css

653 ms

css.css

css.css

1512 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

1952 ms

js.js

js.js

885 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

1549 ms

utils.js

utils.js

858 ms

validator.js

validator.js

1291 ms

banner.css

banner.css

864 ms

slider.js

slider.js

1570 ms

jq.marq.js

jq.marq.js

1081 ms

govicon.js

govicon.js

691 ms

zzsc.js

zzsc.js

1295 ms

nav_bj.jpg

nav_bj.jpg

221 ms

yy_bj.jpg

yy_bj.jpg

218 ms

20160105092313_7167.jpg

20160105092313_7167.jpg

221 ms

xl_bj.png

xl_bj.png

216 ms

20160405085002_2031.jpg

20160405085002_2031.jpg

430 ms

20160405085030_1562.jpg

20160405085030_1562.jpg

660 ms

20160408092636_9062.jpg

20160408092636_9062.jpg

645 ms

20160330213020_9638.jpg

20160330213020_9638.jpg

650 ms

20170320170947_6743.jpg

20170320170947_6743.jpg

2233 ms

search.jpg

search.jpg

437 ms

fdj.jpg

fdj.jpg

646 ms

20170321085644_1275.jpg

20170321085644_1275.jpg

2688 ms

20160316105312_2675.jpg

20160316105312_2675.jpg

1075 ms

20160316111817_2832.jpg

20160316111817_2832.jpg

1076 ms

20160314144137_1123.jpg

20160314144137_1123.jpg

11133 ms

20160222150641_1523.jpg

20160222150641_1523.jpg

10657 ms

20160316170446_4707.jpg

20160316170446_4707.jpg

4610 ms

20160316170921_8613.jpg

20160316170921_8613.jpg

4838 ms

20160314223649_7841.jpg

20160314223649_7841.jpg

5800 ms

20160419162041_8056.jpg

20160419162041_8056.jpg

3160 ms

20180817171840_8593.png

20180817171840_8593.png

3605 ms

20190603155813_1138.jpg

20190603155813_1138.jpg

8268 ms

20181206173349_2421.jpg

20181206173349_2421.jpg

6724 ms

20190329103415_1823.jpg

20190329103415_1823.jpg

8649 ms

20170421170426_3868.jpg

20170421170426_3868.jpg

8358 ms

20160129162420_2382.jpg

20160129162420_2382.jpg

8648 ms

da_tu.png

da_tu.png

8908 ms

bj.jpg

bj.jpg

8574 ms

shi_h.png

shi_h.png

8789 ms

shi.png

shi.png

8864 ms

bj3.png

bj3.png

8864 ms

bj1.png

bj1.png

9007 ms

bj2.png

bj2.png

9080 ms

foot_bj.png

foot_bj.png

9079 ms

tb1.png

tb1.png

9122 ms

tb2.png

tb2.png

9222 ms

share.js

share.js

672 ms

hm.js

hm.js

430 ms

ta.js

ta.js

507 ms

HELVETICANEUE-THINEXT_0.woff

HELVETICANEUE-THINEXT_0.woff

9323 ms

tb3.png

tb3.png

9108 ms

tb4.png

tb4.png

9147 ms

ad_ctr.png

ad_ctr.png

9249 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1188 ms

tpf.js

tpf.js

71 ms

melark.js

melark.js

137 ms

ta.gif

ta.gif

140 ms

tac.js

tac.js

71 ms

ta.gif

ta.gif

70 ms

share_api.js

share_api.js

272 ms

share_view.js

share_view.js

503 ms

select_api.js

select_api.js

475 ms

select_view.js

select_view.js

512 ms

ta.gif

ta.gif

72 ms

tangram.js

tangram.js

464 ms

api_base.js

api_base.js

465 ms

view_base.js

view_base.js

300 ms

partners.js

partners.js

239 ms

share_style0_16.css

share_style0_16.css

322 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

292 ms

b.js

b.js

2064 ms

logger.js

logger.js

256 ms

affim.js

affim.js

1852 ms

Accessibility Review

risewell.cn accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

risewell.cn best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

risewell.cn SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Risewell.cn can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Risewell.cn main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

risewell.cn

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RISEWELL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: