2.5 sec in total
142 ms
2 sec
382 ms
Visit ritchiedevelopment.com now to see the best up-to-date Ritchie Development content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ritchiedevelopment.com
Visit ritchiedevelopment.comWe analyzed Ritchiedevelopment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ritchiedevelopment.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
142 ms
827 ms
21 ms
44 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Ritchiedevelopment.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) belongs to the original domain Ritchiedevelopment.com.
Page size can be reduced by 174.9 kB (18%)
994.4 kB
819.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ritchiedevelopment.com main page is 994.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 426.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritchie Development images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 52.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 52.7 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritchiedevelopment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (70%)
73
22
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritchie Development. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritchiedevelopment.com
142 ms
www.ritchiedevelopment.com
827 ms
js_composer.min.css
21 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
44 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
45 ms
views-frontend.css
43 ms
style.css
46 ms
css2
83 ms
style.css
70 ms
wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-min.css
72 ms
overlay.css
65 ms
wpex-wpbakery.css
62 ms
ticons.min.css
69 ms
vcex-shortcodes.css
72 ms
toolset_maps_fixes.css
71 ms
toolset-common-es-frontend.js
70 ms
jquery.min.js
73 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
76 ms
v4-shims.min.css
73 ms
all.min.css
75 ms
css
122 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
73 ms
owl.theme.green.css
73 ms
font-awesome.min.css
74 ms
animate.css
74 ms
v4-shims.min.css
76 ms
all.min.css
74 ms
rs6.css
76 ms
rbtools.min.js
75 ms
rs6.min.js
111 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
110 ms
superfish.min.js
107 ms
core.min.js
108 ms
sidr.min.js
110 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
109 ms
underscore.min.js
110 ms
wpv_addon_maps.js
111 ms
core.min.js
112 ms
datepicker.min.js
112 ms
mouse.min.js
113 ms
slider.min.js
84 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
79 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
230 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
79 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
62 ms
wp-util.min.js
58 ms
backbone.min.js
205 ms
wp-playlist.min.js
201 ms
views-frontend.js
201 ms
gtm.js
415 ms
bg-home-communities.jpg
366 ms
bg-home-builders.jpg
384 ms
ritchie-logo.svg
97 ms
dummy.png
95 ms
brookfield.png
95 ms
main.png
96 ms
sweetgrass.png
95 ms
firefly.png
96 ms
main-1.png
103 ms
main-3.png
102 ms
main-4.png
101 ms
home6.jpg
145 ms
home3.jpg
145 ms
fb.svg
145 ms
360.svg
249 ms
font
273 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
207 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
205 ms
ticons.woff
406 ms
bg-home-communities.jpg
66 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
216 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
ktag.js
71 ms
67556.js
76 ms
bg-home-builders.jpg
16 ms
activityi;src=11023694;type=audie0;cat=pagev0;ord=5202647828613;auiddc=1368549469.1705528827;gtm=45He41a0v813101663;gcd=11l1l1l1l1;dma=0;epver=2;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ritchiedevelopment.com%2F
84 ms
collect
18 ms
collect
88 ms
js
88 ms
src=11023694;type=audie0;cat=pagev0;ord=5202647828613;auiddc=*;gtm=45He41a0v813101663;gcd=11l1l1l1l1;dma=0;epver=2;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ritchiedevelopment.com%2F
296 ms
wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-max.css
210 ms
ga-audiences
251 ms
ritchiedevelopment.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ritchiedevelopment.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ritchiedevelopment.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritchiedevelopment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritchiedevelopment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritchiedevelopment.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritchie Development. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: