Tools & Wizards About Us
ritchot.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

ritchot.com

Municipality of Ritchot - Home

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

258 ms

ritchot.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ritchot.com homepage info - get ready to check Ritchot best content right away, or after learning these important things about ritchot.com

The Municipality of Ritchot is a beautiful area in Manitoba. The landscape ranges from riverbanks to rolling wheat fields. With the comfort & safety of small town life, and the convenience of city ame...

Visit ritchot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritchot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritchot.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.274

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ritchot.com

42 ms

ritchot.com

585 ms

normalize.css

27 ms

bootstrap.min.css

2336 ms

font-awesome.min.css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Ritchot.com, 26% (20 requests) were made to Ritchot.allnetconnect.ca and 5% (4 requests) were made to Rmritchot.municipalwebsites.ca. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritchot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (50%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ritchot.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 99.7 kB

  • Original 112.2 kB
  • After minification 73.7 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.5 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritchot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 610.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 558.1 kB

  • Original 661.7 kB
  • After minification 547.4 kB
  • After compression 103.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritchot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 558.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (78%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritchot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ritchot.com

ritchot.com

42 ms

ritchot.com

ritchot.com

585 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

27 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

2336 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

78 ms

default.css

default.css

2237 ms

variables.css

variables.css

66 ms

weather.css

weather.css

2301 ms

froala_editor.min.css

froala_editor.min.css

2274 ms

froala_style-custom.css

froala_style-custom.css

98 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

103 ms

main.css

main.css

158 ms

print.css

print.css

131 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.js

modernizr-2.6.2.js

173 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

189 ms

carousel.css

carousel.css

214 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

2385 ms

0fd5809d9d.js

0fd5809d9d.js

68 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

js

js

55 ms

jquery-1-12-4.min.js

jquery-1-12-4.min.js

254 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.js

280 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

310 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js

348 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

376 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

402 ms

touchSwipe.min.js

touchSwipe.min.js

428 ms

prefixfree.js

prefixfree.js

459 ms

simple-weather-min.js

simple-weather-min.js

483 ms

moment-with-locales.js

moment-with-locales.js

566 ms

simple-weather-initialize.js

simple-weather-initialize.js

593 ms

fitvids.js

fitvids.js

619 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

645 ms

custom-scripts.js

custom-scripts.js

674 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

ba6e10a9-aaa0-498d-9e44-85ecfafc9a56.jpg

ba6e10a9-aaa0-498d-9e44-85ecfafc9a56.jpg

520 ms

register

register

568 ms

ef727eba-3395-4acc-a756-ed2787b39432.jpg

ef727eba-3395-4acc-a756-ed2787b39432.jpg

511 ms

75e81064-e99f-4b0a-a630-7968713363ba.jpg

75e81064-e99f-4b0a-a630-7968713363ba.jpg

467 ms

defaultNotice.jpg

defaultNotice.jpg

468 ms

Ritchot.jpg

Ritchot.jpg

259 ms

bgNavShadow.jpg

bgNavShadow.jpg

260 ms

bgApp.jpg

bgApp.jpg

466 ms

ritchot-logo-white.png

ritchot-logo-white.png

259 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

260 ms

yql

yql

202 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

244 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

243 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

202 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxo.woff

141 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVeww.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVeww.woff

156 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

198 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

199 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

62 ms

animations.css

animations.css

2114 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

2074 ms

public-form.css

public-form.css

2095 ms

app.css

app.css

2034 ms

jquery.ui.core.css

jquery.ui.core.css

2106 ms

jquery.ui.autocomplete.css

jquery.ui.autocomplete.css

134 ms

jquery-1.12.4.js

jquery-1.12.4.js

246 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

313 ms

MicrosoftAjax.js

MicrosoftAjax.js

378 ms

MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js

MicrosoftAjaxWebForms.js

445 ms

jquery-3.1.0.min.js

jquery-3.1.0.min.js

514 ms

jquery-ui-1.12.0.min.js

jquery-ui-1.12.0.min.js

572 ms

WebFormsJs

WebFormsJs

631 ms

jquery.mask.min.js

jquery.mask.min.js

690 ms

js

js

71 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

53 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

52 ms

fallback

fallback

21 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

55 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

98 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

3 ms

css

css

20 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

4 ms

Accessibility Review

ritchot.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ritchot.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ritchot.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritchot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritchot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritchot.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritchot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: