Tools & Wizards About Us
ritetrack.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ritetrack.co.uk

Silent Gliss Metropole, Autoglide and electric curtain tracks for less. - Silent Gliss at Low Prices

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

618 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

ritetrack.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ritetrack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritetrack.co.uk

We sell Silent Gliss hand drawn, corded and electric curtain tracks and Metropoles. We offer a curtain track bending service for bay windows and specialise in extra long curtain tracks for wide window...

Visit ritetrack.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritetrack.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 618 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritetrack.co.uk performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ritetrack.co.uk

618 ms

2e8946c51c4e07cdc19c0d08617ad396.flat-blue.css.php

162 ms

dae9357400e049f839d1e3b20333f334.jquery.js.php

345 ms

b9486148fab0f4b573fdbb9a8e7de1b2.jqueryui.js.php

418 ms

266e30143a17e6209357941862fa483b.flat-blue.functions.js.php

335 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Ritetrack.co.uk, 22% (6 requests) were made to Secure.worldpay.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Worldpay.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (618 ms) belongs to the original domain Ritetrack.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.2 kB (16%)

Content Size

272.8 kB

After Optimization

228.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ritetrack.co.uk main page is 272.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 147.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 29.5 kB
  • After minification 29.3 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 147.0 kB
  • After minification 136.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritetrack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 96.3 kB
  • After minification 96.3 kB
  • After compression 85.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (18%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritetrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ritetrack.co.uk

www.ritetrack.co.uk

618 ms

2e8946c51c4e07cdc19c0d08617ad396.flat-blue.css.php

2e8946c51c4e07cdc19c0d08617ad396.flat-blue.css.php

162 ms

dae9357400e049f839d1e3b20333f334.jquery.js.php

dae9357400e049f839d1e3b20333f334.jquery.js.php

345 ms

b9486148fab0f4b573fdbb9a8e7de1b2.jqueryui.js.php

b9486148fab0f4b573fdbb9a8e7de1b2.jqueryui.js.php

418 ms

266e30143a17e6209357941862fa483b.flat-blue.functions.js.php

266e30143a17e6209357941862fa483b.flat-blue.functions.js.php

335 ms

df28e606b4c989852ce76b8e80b81012.menu.js.php

df28e606b4c989852ce76b8e80b81012.menu.js.php

242 ms

logo

logo

159 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

152 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

113 ms

WP_ECMC.gif

WP_ECMC.gif

79 ms

poweredByWorldPay.gif

poweredByWorldPay.gif

215 ms

Blueparker-071122.woff

Blueparker-071122.woff

83 ms

WP_JCB.gif

WP_JCB.gif

99 ms

WP_MAESTRO.gif

WP_MAESTRO.gif

108 ms

WP_VISA_DELTA.gif

WP_VISA_DELTA.gif

91 ms

poweredByWorldPay.gif

poweredByWorldPay.gif

98 ms

Delivery%20(white)%20wording%20192%20new.jpg

Delivery%20(white)%20wording%20192%20new.jpg

84 ms

Contact_Us_Icon_4.jpg

Contact_Us_Icon_4.jpg

83 ms

SG_5_year_guarantee.jpg

SG_5_year_guarantee.jpg

152 ms

Silent%20Gliss%20for%20less%20with%20logo%201000.jpg

Silent%20Gliss%20for%20less%20with%20logo%201000.jpg

230 ms

SG5100T.jpg

SG5100T.jpg

157 ms

spacerv.gif

spacerv.gif

158 ms

SG5100R.jpg

SG5100R.jpg

191 ms

SG5100TC.jpg

SG5100TC.jpg

233 ms

spacerh.gif

spacerh.gif

229 ms

SG5100B.jpg

SG5100B.jpg

232 ms

logo-1467393482.png

logo-1467393482.png

241 ms

Accessibility Review

ritetrack.co.uk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

ritetrack.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ritetrack.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritetrack.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritetrack.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritetrack.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ritetrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: