6.1 sec in total
372 ms
5.5 sec
231 ms
Click here to check amazing RITTA content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ritta.com
The marketing firm with over 35 years' history creating the digital marketing, branding and creative services that generate growth and success in any industry.
Visit ritta.comWe analyzed Ritta.com page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ritta.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value4,000 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value25.7 s
0/100
10%
372 ms
103 ms
258 ms
285 ms
283 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ritta.com, 19% (14 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritta.com.
Page size can be reduced by 402.2 kB (8%)
5.0 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ritta.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 333.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RITTA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritta.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (80%)
54
11
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RITTA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ritta.com
372 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
103 ms
style.min.css
258 ms
styles.css
285 ms
style.css
283 ms
app.css
406 ms
jquery.min.js
445 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
445 ms
js
155 ms
index.js
463 ms
index.js
463 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
462 ms
navigation.js
461 ms
core.min.js
480 ms
mouse.min.js
469 ms
resizable.min.js
463 ms
draggable.min.js
477 ms
controlgroup.min.js
466 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
461 ms
button.min.js
487 ms
dialog.min.js
481 ms
effect.min.js
482 ms
global.js
485 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
484 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
490 ms
wp-gallery-custom-links.js
539 ms
lazysizes.min.js
547 ms
12594523C6995FB3B.css
867 ms
gtm.js
92 ms
ritta_logo_stacked_KO.svg
242 ms
facebook.svg
240 ms
instagram.svg
237 ms
twitter.svg
236 ms
linkedIn.svg
233 ms
analytics.js
165 ms
HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==
53 ms
HpAawDtjwP9fo78woYjQ==
49 ms
1+jvzChiN
49 ms
MKGI0=
47 ms
MKGI0=
46 ms
roundtrip.js
329 ms
Image-1@2x.jpg
1086 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
56 ms
index.js
2 ms
iStock-503229252.jpg
255 ms
Shot14_MQ9wand_Hummus_OH_editorial.jpg
367 ms
RP4GSYFZ5JDRJEIRLEQZZD
15 ms
fbevents.js
36 ms
out
14 ms
3PR2E4TFSNDXRP2OHVXB5E
15 ms
out
17 ms
out
18 ms
out
44 ms
out
41 ms
out
40 ms
out
43 ms
out
43 ms
out
46 ms
out
46 ms
out
45 ms
sync
142 ms
Pug
109 ms
tap.php
105 ms
A35I8338-1.jpg
417 ms
pixel
111 ms
rum
65 ms
720661994669102
99 ms
xuid
4 ms
bounce
8 ms
pixel
16 ms
sd
13 ms
in
5 ms
ritta.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ritta.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ritta.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritta.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ritta.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ritta.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RITTA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: