Tools & Wizards About Us
riverrestoration.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

riverrestoration.org

RiverRestoration - River Restoration

Page Load Speed

608 ms in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

337 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

riverrestoration.org screenshot

About Website

Visit riverrestoration.org now to see the best up-to-date River Restoration content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riverrestoration.org

About River Restoration

Visit riverrestoration.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Riverrestoration.org page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 511 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riverrestoration.org performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riverrestoration.org

97 ms

styles.css

31 ms

colors.css

40 ms

javascript.js

53 ms

header_on.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Riverrestoration.org, 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (115 ms) belongs to the original domain Riverrestoration.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

335.7 kB

After Optimization

287.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riverrestoration.org main page is 335.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 273.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 12.1 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 273.9 kB
  • After minification 260.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. River Restoration images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 31.8 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 18.0 kB
  • After minification 10.9 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riverrestoration.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (37%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of River Restoration. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riverrestoration.org

riverrestoration.org

97 ms

styles.css

styles.css

31 ms

colors.css

colors.css

40 ms

javascript.js

javascript.js

53 ms

header_on.css

header_on.css

41 ms

rw_logo.css

rw_logo.css

41 ms

medium.css

medium.css

44 ms

iceblue.css

iceblue.css

44 ms

georgia.css

georgia.css

54 ms

titlegeorgia.css

titlegeorgia.css

92 ms

sloganhelvetica.css

sloganhelvetica.css

93 ms

20px.css

20px.css

93 ms

slogandisplay.css

slogandisplay.css

92 ms

blogtitle_doc.css

blogtitle_doc.css

92 ms

search_on.css

search_on.css

93 ms

footerleft.css

footerleft.css

92 ms

ga.js

ga.js

6 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

26 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

7 ms

a1.jpg

a1.jpg

23 ms

a2.jpg

a2.jpg

27 ms

a3.jpg

a3.jpg

29 ms

a4.jpg

a4.jpg

27 ms

a5.jpg

a5.jpg

31 ms

a6.jpg

a6.jpg

31 ms

a7.jpg

a7.jpg

39 ms

a8.jpg

a8.jpg

54 ms

a9.jpg

a9.jpg

50 ms

a10.jpg

a10.jpg

50 ms

a11.jpg

a11.jpg

58 ms

a12.jpg

a12.jpg

57 ms

a13.jpg

a13.jpg

57 ms

top.jpg

top.jpg

78 ms

spotlight.png

spotlight.png

76 ms

iceblue.jpg

iceblue.jpg

75 ms

5.png

5.png

115 ms

Accessibility Review

riverrestoration.org accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

riverrestoration.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

riverrestoration.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riverrestoration.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Riverrestoration.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riverrestoration.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of River Restoration. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: