3.2 sec in total
169 ms
2.6 sec
408 ms
Click here to check amazing Riveting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riveting.com
Riveting Media ® Inc. is a web design and development company in Half Moon Bay providing website design, SEO & Digital Marketing services.
Visit riveting.comWe analyzed Riveting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
riveting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value2,510 ms
4/100
30%
Value1.05
2/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
169 ms
1527 ms
56 ms
108 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Riveting.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Riveting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 193.0 kB (10%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Riveting.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riveting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riveting.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (58%)
76
32
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riveting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riveting.com
169 ms
www.riveting.com
1527 ms
style.min.css
56 ms
styles.css
108 ms
style.css
158 ms
rs6.css
160 ms
front-flex.min.css
159 ms
style.css
160 ms
style.css
158 ms
bootstrap.min.css
163 ms
style.css
209 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
212 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
210 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
211 ms
components.css
222 ms
page-builder.css
213 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
260 ms
jquery.min.js
272 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
272 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
291 ms
rs6.min.js
338 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
336 ms
bootstrap.min.js
336 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
336 ms
bootstrap-tabcollapse.js
336 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
337 ms
inview.js
357 ms
sticky.js
365 ms
functions.js
367 ms
orion-svg.js
369 ms
css
29 ms
style.css
404 ms
index.js
405 ms
index.js
406 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
447 ms
core.min.js
447 ms
datepicker.min.js
464 ms
html5-fallback.js
464 ms
api.js
41 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
464 ms
css
13 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
414 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
396 ms
index.js
346 ms
styling.min.js
360 ms
2021-RM-Logo-6.png
133 ms
bay-area-web-design-homeslider-14.jpg
303 ms
rafael-soultanov-150x150.jpg
133 ms
5-star-100.png
196 ms
Diana-Boiteux-3-150x150.jpg
196 ms
Brad_Hunsaker_2-150x150.jpg
198 ms
Jesse-Meyer-2-150x150.jpg
197 ms
whitaker-504x500.jpg
302 ms
rocn-and-roll-dental-504x500.jpg
310 ms
union-square-detnal-504x500.jpg
301 ms
serenity-504x500.jpg
309 ms
fresno-dentist-504x500.jpg
302 ms
apollonia-detnal-504x500.jpg
309 ms
smile-central-valley-504x500.jpg
309 ms
lift-pargaliging-2-504x500.jpg
310 ms
truist-dental-504x500.jpg
310 ms
AzimiLogo3-300x129.png
360 ms
serenity-dental-logo.png
357 ms
Netzley-DDS-Logo.png
359 ms
ExtrapordoinarySmile.png
358 ms
palo-alto-dentstry-logo-7.png
359 ms
Ramaekers-Logo-2.jpg
358 ms
los-angeles-dentist-logo4.jpg
413 ms
Apollonia-logo.png
394 ms
SCV-logo.png
388 ms
Lift-logo226x156-border.png
387 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
60 ms
Orionicon.woff
387 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
60 ms
widget.js
253 ms
half-moon-bay-area-web-design-2.jpg
345 ms
Half-Moon-Bay-Area-SEO.jpg
398 ms
half-moon-bay-area-ecommerce-websites.jpg
381 ms
half-moon-bay-area-web-design-3.jpg
382 ms
recaptcha__en.js
80 ms
ionicons.ttf
394 ms
widget_app_base_1706906186205.js
18 ms
riveting.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
riveting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
riveting.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riveting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riveting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riveting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riveting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: