1.8 sec in total
456 ms
1 sec
296 ms
Welcome to rjgeib.com homepage info - get ready to check Rj Geib best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rjgeib.com
Visit rjgeib.comWe analyzed Rjgeib.com page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
rjgeib.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value7.0 s
33/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
456 ms
32 ms
71 ms
49 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Rjgeib.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (456 ms) belongs to the original domain Rjgeib.com.
Page size can be reduced by 698.0 kB (51%)
1.4 MB
663.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rjgeib.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 547.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rj Geib images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 384.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 384.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 247.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rjgeib.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 247.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (57%)
54
23
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rj Geib. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rjgeib.com
456 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
32 ms
dashicons.min.css
71 ms
wunderground.css
49 ms
font-awesome.min.css
57 ms
symple_shortcodes_styles.css
50 ms
sfsi-style.css
60 ms
jquery-ui-min.css
63 ms
style.css
96 ms
css
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
74 ms
jquery.js
118 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
74 ms
core.min.js
83 ms
widget.min.js
92 ms
position.min.js
107 ms
menu.min.js
107 ms
autocomplete.min.js
109 ms
widget.min.js
116 ms
addthis_widget.js
59 ms
widgets.js
105 ms
jquery.form.min.js
218 ms
scripts.js
219 ms
jquery-ui-min.js
224 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
220 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
219 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
220 ms
custom.js
220 ms
comment-reply.min.js
220 ms
plugins.js
222 ms
global-min.js
220 ms
sdk.js
62 ms
header-top-pattern.png
69 ms
728x90.png
73 ms
2geibfamily2014-300x200.jpg
70 ms
3geibfamily2014-300x200.jpg
70 ms
1geibfamily2014.jpg
124 ms
crystal_rss.png
68 ms
crystal_email.png
71 ms
crystal_facebook.png
71 ms
crystal_twitter.png
95 ms
crystal_share.png
96 ms
border-stripe.png
97 ms
cloudy.gif
97 ms
partlycloudy.gif
98 ms
raindrop-sprite.png
121 ms
clear.gif
123 ms
wundergroundLogo_4c_horz.png
123 ms
rectangle.png
124 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
67 ms
cj2hUnSRBhwmSPr9kS589-LrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf
66 ms
c92rD_x0V1LslSFt3-QEpmsGzsqhEorxQDpu60nfWEc.ttf
69 ms
6nvU963vW96zvuZHXyGvkNfLa8try2vLa8try2vLa8try2vLaPbzi90vRj6IfRT+KfhS9KHpR9KLoRdGLohdFL4peFL0oelH0ouhF0YuiF0Uvil4UvSh6UfSi6EXRi6IXRS+KXhS9KHpR9KHoQ9GHog9FH4o+FD0oelD0oOToN3TgiAFDRg4b9C8VmLmgAAAAAVWwJZkAAA==
24 ms
VerbRegular-webfont.woff
119 ms
VerbLight-webfont.woff
119 ms
VerbBold-webfont.woff
119 ms
208 ms
xd_arbiter.php
79 ms
xd_arbiter.php
113 ms
300lo.json
57 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
145 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
33 ms
rjgeib.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rjgeib.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rjgeib.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjgeib.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rjgeib.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rjgeib.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rj Geib. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: