Tools & Wizards About Us
rlitexaschapter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

rlitexaschapter.com

Home

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

20 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

373 ms

rlitexaschapter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rlitexaschapter.com homepage info - get ready to check Rlitexaschapter best content right away, or after learning these important things about rlitexaschapter.com

The Destination for Land Expertise for land real estate professionals in Texas. Become a land professional. Find a land professional. REALTORS Land Institute Texas Chapter Members.

Visit rlitexaschapter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rlitexaschapter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 20 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rlitexaschapter.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rlitexaschapter.com

20 ms

texas

260 ms

default.css

87 ms

SearchSkinObjectPreview.css

99 ms

skin.css

151 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rlitexaschapter.com, 79% (57 requests) were made to Rliland.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) relates to the external source Rliland.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (42%)

Content Size

5.6 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rlitexaschapter.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 58.9 kB

  • Original 75.6 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 292.2 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rlitexaschapter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 581.9 kB

  • Original 909.8 kB
  • After minification 881.4 kB
  • After compression 327.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 581.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 184.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rlitexaschapter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (76%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rlitexaschapter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rlitexaschapter.com

rlitexaschapter.com

20 ms

texas

texas

260 ms

default.css

default.css

87 ms

SearchSkinObjectPreview.css

SearchSkinObjectPreview.css

99 ms

skin.css

skin.css

151 ms

homepage10.css

homepage10.css

174 ms

container.css

container.css

112 ms

container.css

container.css

136 ms

portal.css

portal.css

113 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

51 ms

jquery.mmenu.css

jquery.mmenu.css

119 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

135 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

178 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

138 ms

turn-on.js

turn-on.js

159 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

159 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

159 ms

dnn.js

dnn.js

172 ms

dnncore.js

dnncore.js

178 ms

dnngo-ThemePlugin.js

dnngo-ThemePlugin.js

202 ms

SearchSkinObjectPreview.js

SearchSkinObjectPreview.js

183 ms

dnn.servicesframework.js

dnn.servicesframework.js

193 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

236 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

script.js

script.js

270 ms

custom.js

custom.js

179 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

35 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

50 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

123 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

109 ms

accordions.css

accordions.css

97 ms

alerts-message.css

alerts-message.css

90 ms

animated-columns.css

animated-columns.css

113 ms

botton.css

botton.css

114 ms

dg-title.css

dg-title.css

121 ms

clients.css

clients.css

131 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

132 ms

pages.css

pages.css

169 ms

icon-box.css

icon-box.css

143 ms

pricing.css

pricing.css

145 ms

blog.css

blog.css

152 ms

portfolios.css

portfolios.css

155 ms

imagebox.css

imagebox.css

166 ms

testimonial.css

testimonial.css

168 ms

chart.css

chart.css

174 ms

promo-boxes.css

promo-boxes.css

177 ms

flip-box.css

flip-box.css

182 ms

dividers.css

dividers.css

188 ms

ourteam.css

ourteam.css

190 ms

RLI-Chapter-Logo_Texas.png

RLI-Chapter-Logo_Texas.png

34 ms

Texas%20Slider%20Website%20Photo.png

Texas%20Slider%20Website%20Photo.png

711 ms

RLI_ChapterSite_1_Land.jpg

RLI_ChapterSite_1_Land.jpg

477 ms

RLI_ChapterSite_2_Ropes.jpg

RLI_ChapterSite_2_Ropes.jpg

477 ms

RLI_ChapterSite_3_People%20alternative.jpg

RLI_ChapterSite_3_People%20alternative.jpg

478 ms

icon_knowtheland.png

icon_knowtheland.png

33 ms

icon_knowtheropes.png

icon_knowtheropes.png

70 ms

icon_knowthepeople.png

icon_knowthepeople.png

189 ms

Allen,%20Albert.jpg

Allen,%20Albert.jpg

190 ms

Robertson,%20Deitra.JPG

Robertson,%20Deitra.JPG

476 ms

Harvey,%20Renee%202022.jpg

Harvey,%20Renee%202022.jpg

475 ms

Body_bg_2.png

Body_bg_2.png

461 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

156 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

157 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

441 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

442 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

444 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

444 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

152 ms

FooterBackground.jpg

FooterBackground.jpg

410 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

67 ms

js

js

105 ms

Accessibility Review

rlitexaschapter.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rlitexaschapter.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rlitexaschapter.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rlitexaschapter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rlitexaschapter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rlitexaschapter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rlitexaschapter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: