Tools & Wizards About Us
rm2.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rm2.co.uk

Employee Ownership Trusts & Employee Share Plans | The RM2 Partnership

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

382 ms

rm2.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RM2 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rm2.co.uk

RM2 are the Employee Share Scheme Specialists. The RM2 Partnership designs, implements & administers Employee Share Incentive Plans for private companies

Visit rm2.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Rm2.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rm2.co.uk performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,660 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rm2.co.uk

300 ms

www.rm2.co.uk

890 ms

gtm.js

50 ms

autoptimize_single_3fd2afa98866679439097f4ab102fe0a.css

157 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

239 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Rm2.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Apikeys.civiccomputing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (890 ms) belongs to the original domain Rm2.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

777.4 kB

After Optimization

691.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rm2.co.uk main page is 777.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 262.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 84.8 kB

  • Original 105.4 kB
  • After minification 105.4 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 84 B

  • Original 262.4 kB
  • After minification 262.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RM2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 491 B

  • Original 228.8 kB
  • After minification 228.8 kB
  • After compression 228.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 511 B

  • Original 180.8 kB
  • After minification 180.8 kB
  • After compression 180.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rm2.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (86%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RM2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rm2.co.uk

rm2.co.uk

300 ms

www.rm2.co.uk

www.rm2.co.uk

890 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

50 ms

autoptimize_single_3fd2afa98866679439097f4ab102fe0a.css

autoptimize_single_3fd2afa98866679439097f4ab102fe0a.css

157 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

239 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

252 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

253 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

531 ms

autoptimize_single_4fe1858c1704416657e621748bc941d7.css

autoptimize_single_4fe1858c1704416657e621748bc941d7.css

262 ms

autoptimize_single_f39c70ecf57c6a46831ecf59021da547.css

autoptimize_single_f39c70ecf57c6a46831ecf59021da547.css

265 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

322 ms

autoptimize_single_f5ab39d93a132513d9636a43da98cdfb.css

autoptimize_single_f5ab39d93a132513d9636a43da98cdfb.css

332 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

421 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

348 ms

post-68.css

post-68.css

349 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

402 ms

autoptimize_single_0430a3f23e36c719e94ce63501679d21.css

autoptimize_single_0430a3f23e36c719e94ce63501679d21.css

414 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

525 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

436 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

413 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

425 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

431 ms

autoptimize_single_efc27e253fae1b7b891fb5a40e687768.js

autoptimize_single_efc27e253fae1b7b891fb5a40e687768.js

452 ms

autoptimize_single_0b1719adf5fa7231cb1a1b54cf11a50e.js

autoptimize_single_0b1719adf5fa7231cb1a1b54cf11a50e.js

614 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

614 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

620 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

622 ms

autoptimize_single_eae574630691cbf72e5796b9d7572260.js

autoptimize_single_eae574630691cbf72e5796b9d7572260.js

622 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

622 ms

autoptimize_single_72f19f5f564a43b1175f9ce86981987c.js

autoptimize_single_72f19f5f564a43b1175f9ce86981987c.js

626 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

626 ms

autoptimize_single_95ba7bb2e3c9da8d1322daadc7ce2457.js

autoptimize_single_95ba7bb2e3c9da8d1322daadc7ce2457.js

627 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

721 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

633 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

633 ms

autoptimize_single_f556337e0f81cf84d8e083a0a0c07ea4.js

autoptimize_single_f556337e0f81cf84d8e083a0a0c07ea4.js

657 ms

autoptimize_single_38ade284e1c3428a4f273a5d7d253946.js

autoptimize_single_38ade284e1c3428a4f273a5d7d253946.js

673 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

681 ms

autoptimize_single_3637fe9df875e14939193bc389e1a249.js

autoptimize_single_3637fe9df875e14939193bc389e1a249.js

710 ms

autoptimize_single_848541d049801e8d48d70c1ca54a7b55.js

autoptimize_single_848541d049801e8d48d70c1ca54a7b55.js

634 ms

default.min.js

default.min.js

582 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

577 ms

autoptimize_single_bfdd6c4c5dc7ef5b4ebe632090b3e7da.js

autoptimize_single_bfdd6c4c5dc7ef5b4ebe632090b3e7da.js

585 ms

qode-slider-part.min.js

qode-slider-part.min.js

618 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

613 ms

qode-like.min.js

qode-like.min.js

554 ms

autoptimize_single_75218b65a3d88521b966f9f8e761430f.js

autoptimize_single_75218b65a3d88521b966f9f8e761430f.js

568 ms

ccc-cookie-control.js

ccc-cookie-control.js

564 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

620 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

568 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

554 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

541 ms

chevron-right-light-icon.svg

chevron-right-light-icon.svg

396 ms

quote-open.png

quote-open.png

397 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

383 ms

v

v

461 ms

RM2-Employee-Ownership-logo.png

RM2-Employee-Ownership-logo.png

82 ms

search-icon.svg

search-icon.svg

88 ms

RM2-header2.jpg

RM2-header2.jpg

369 ms

Accessibility Review

rm2.co.uk accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rm2.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rm2.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rm2.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rm2.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rm2.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RM2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: