Tools & Wizards About Us
rmapack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rmapack.com

rmapack.com-精品域名，老域名，精品米铺

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

rmapack.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rmapack.com now to see the best up-to-date Rmapack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rmapack.com

老域名，精品域名出售

Visit rmapack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rmapack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rmapack.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.rmapack.com

50 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

74 ms

autoptimize_cb2cb6a96db4c9db0dda73a678d91b43.css

35 ms

autoptimize_b6fd9ec333120ec9786fbfb172de1531.css

49 ms

jquery.js

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Rmapack.com, 29% (14 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rmapack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 606.6 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rmapack.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 43.8 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rmapack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 303.8 kB

  • Original 429.0 kB
  • After minification 426.1 kB
  • After compression 125.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 231.5 kB

  • Original 288.7 kB
  • After minification 288.7 kB
  • After compression 57.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rmapack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 231.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rmapack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rmapack.com

www.rmapack.com

50 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

74 ms

autoptimize_cb2cb6a96db4c9db0dda73a678d91b43.css

autoptimize_cb2cb6a96db4c9db0dda73a678d91b43.css

35 ms

autoptimize_b6fd9ec333120ec9786fbfb172de1531.css

autoptimize_b6fd9ec333120ec9786fbfb172de1531.css

49 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

49 ms

js

js

192 ms

right.js

right.js

190 ms

autoptimize_2e1527e07aedf0f8e820498fed3b9dcb.js

autoptimize_2e1527e07aedf0f8e820498fed3b9dcb.js

61 ms

logo_50.png

logo_50.png

157 ms

automatic_pouch_packing_machine.jpg

automatic_pouch_packing_machine.jpg

446 ms

bag_packing_machine-banner.jpg

bag_packing_machine-banner.jpg

381 ms

open_mouth_bagging_machine.jpg

open_mouth_bagging_machine.jpg

328 ms

premade_pouch_packing_machine.jpg

premade_pouch_packing_machine.jpg

329 ms

vertical_form_fill_seal_machine.jpg

vertical_form_fill_seal_machine.jpg

355 ms

History.png

History.png

226 ms

services.jpg

services.jpg

360 ms

our-team.jpg

our-team.jpg

451 ms

Package-Types.png

Package-Types.png

456 ms

Quality-Control.jpg

Quality-Control.jpg

557 ms

factory.jpg

factory.jpg

553 ms

Bag-Packing-Machine.jpg

Bag-Packing-Machine.jpg

747 ms

Premade-Pouch-Packing-Machine.jpg

Premade-Pouch-Packing-Machine.jpg

691 ms

Automatic-Pouch-Packing-Machine.jpg

Automatic-Pouch-Packing-Machine.jpg

707 ms

Vertical-Form-Fill-Seal-Machine.jpg

Vertical-Form-Fill-Seal-Machine.jpg

709 ms

Open-Mouth-Bagging-Machine.jpg

Open-Mouth-Bagging-Machine.jpg

861 ms

Powder-Packaging-Machine.jpg

Powder-Packaging-Machine.jpg

829 ms

Granule-Packing-Machine.jpg

Granule-Packing-Machine.jpg

906 ms

Secondary-Packaging-Machine.jpg

Secondary-Packaging-Machine.jpg

996 ms

Multihead-Weighing-Machine.jpg

Multihead-Weighing-Machine.jpg

974 ms

horizontal-carton-wrapping-machine-automatic-cartoning-machine-370x270.jpg

horizontal-carton-wrapping-machine-automatic-cartoning-machine-370x270.jpg

948 ms

Intelligent-Box-Taping-Machine-Carton-Sealer-Packaging-Industry-370x270.jpg

Intelligent-Box-Taping-Machine-Carton-Sealer-Packaging-Industry-370x270.jpg

1023 ms

High-Efficiency-Secondary-Packaging-Machine-Automatic-Carton-Sealing-Machine-370x270.jpg

High-Efficiency-Secondary-Packaging-Machine-Automatic-Carton-Sealing-Machine-370x270.jpg

1058 ms

Carton-Box-Packaging-Machine-Secondary-Packing-High-Reliability-370x270.jpg

Carton-Box-Packaging-Machine-Secondary-Packing-High-Reliability-370x270.jpg

1107 ms

ar.png

ar.png

24 ms

nl.png

nl.png

27 ms

en.png

en.png

26 ms

fr.png

fr.png

26 ms

de.png

de.png

27 ms

it.png

it.png

26 ms

ja.png

ja.png

34 ms

fa.png

fa.png

32 ms

pt.png

pt.png

32 ms

ru.png

ru.png

33 ms

es.png

es.png

33 ms

tr.png

tr.png

33 ms

th.png

th.png

34 ms

css

css

47 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1140 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

22 ms

SEO Factors

rmapack.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rmapack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rmapack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rmapack.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rmapack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: