4.8 sec in total
628 ms
3.6 sec
551 ms
Click here to check amazing RNDT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rndt.net
RNDT performs nondestructive testing and weld inspection services including magnetic particle testing, liquid penetrant testing, industrial x-ray testing, and PMI.
Visit rndt.netWe analyzed Rndt.net page load time and found that the first response time was 628 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rndt.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value31.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.9 s
0/100
10%
Value8,300 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value26.2 s
0/100
10%
628 ms
204 ms
67 ms
79 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Rndt.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (628 ms) belongs to the original domain Rndt.net.
Page size can be reduced by 249.3 kB (5%)
4.9 MB
4.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Rndt.net main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RNDT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rndt.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (63%)
68
25
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RNDT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rndt.net
628 ms
gtm.js
204 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
67 ms
style.min.css
79 ms
rs6.css
72 ms
passster-public.min.css
67 ms
style.css
56 ms
css
135 ms
css
180 ms
superfish.css
66 ms
component.css
135 ms
font-awesome.min.css
158 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
161 ms
flexslider.css
142 ms
style-responsive.css
162 ms
style-custom.css
164 ms
frontend.css
184 ms
masterslider.main.css
184 ms
custom.css
193 ms
jquery.min.js
208 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
202 ms
revolution.tools.min.js
207 ms
rs6.min.js
335 ms
cookie.js
334 ms
captcha.js
332 ms
passster-public.min.js
374 ms
css
195 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
372 ms
superfish.js
389 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
566 ms
modernizr.custom.js
544 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
566 ms
jquery.easing.js
587 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
588 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
599 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
603 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
619 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
624 ms
gdlr-script.js
619 ms
js
116 ms
maps.js
622 ms
conversion.js
154 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
loader.js
91 ms
call-tracking_7.js
131 ms
collect
236 ms
facebook.png
426 ms
linkedin.png
463 ms
twitter.png
464 ms
youtube.png
476 ms
RNDT_web_logo.png
499 ms
RNDT_web_slide1.jpg
551 ms
RNDT_web_slide5.jpg
515 ms
RNDT_web_slide2.jpg
552 ms
RNDT_web_slide3.jpg
588 ms
RNDT_web_slide4.jpg
581 ms
RNDT_logo-150x150.png
545 ms
IMG_0367-150x150.jpg
567 ms
Bridge-RNDT-150x150.jpg
568 ms
iso.png
579 ms
a2la-70.png
579 ms
isn-70.png
587 ms
veriforce-logo.png
585 ms
ISN-Logo.png
606 ms
RNDT_web_bg.jpg
581 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
569 ms
collect
262 ms
wcm
277 ms
gen_204
229 ms
207 ms
48 ms
rndt.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rndt.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rndt.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rndt.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rndt.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rndt.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RNDT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: