7.3 sec in total
832 ms
5.9 sec
527 ms
Visit roamingowls.com now to see the best up-to-date Roaming Owls content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roamingowls.com
Wildlife stories from our travels to the wild places of the planet. A blog about birds, butterflies, wildflowers and much more.
Visit roamingowls.comWe analyzed Roamingowls.com page load time and found that the first response time was 832 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
roamingowls.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value12.8 s
2/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
832 ms
418 ms
817 ms
36 ms
619 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Roamingowls.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Roamingowls.com.
Page size can be reduced by 84.0 kB (2%)
4.0 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Roamingowls.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roaming Owls images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 145 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roamingowls.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (26%)
23
17
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roaming Owls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
roamingowls.com
832 ms
98bdb.css
418 ms
ea1ff.css
817 ms
css
36 ms
b7466.css
619 ms
4f641.js
824 ms
8fc7a.js
622 ms
91547.js
879 ms
1615d.js
625 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
18 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
26 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
415 ms
Roaming-owls-emoji.jpg
614 ms
waterfalls-steps-1.jpeg
1004 ms
Jimny-car-offroad-1-scaled.jpeg
2198 ms
Elephants-in-grasslands-periyar-tiger-reserve-Gavi.jpg
1025 ms
litchi-stink-bug.jpg
812 ms
Common-emigrant-butterflies-mudpudling.jpeg
816 ms
DSC8989.jpg
1429 ms
Christisonia-tubulosa-Magenta-Ghost-Flower-e1604251226610.jpg
1020 ms
gopher-tortoise-vinod-merritt-island-e1604251126157.jpg
1026 ms
Theri-Kaadu-red-sand-mathi-green-shrub-300x225.jpg
1210 ms
mathi-rock-impatiens-300x225.jpg
1230 ms
where-we-travel-mathi-primula-thumbnail-300x225.jpg
1237 ms
vinod-snow-travel-is-not-for-everyone-300x225.jpg
1234 ms
vinod-mathi-how-we-fund-our-travels-300x225.jpg
1427 ms
pallikaranai-garbage-dumping-thumbnail-300x225.jpg
1439 ms
roamingowls.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
roamingowls.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
roamingowls.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roamingowls.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roamingowls.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roamingowls.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roaming Owls. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: