2.1 sec in total
78 ms
1.5 sec
502 ms
Visit robots.com now to see the best up-to-date Robots content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about robots.com
Robots.com offers like new industrial robots up to 75% off OEM pricing. We can work with any application including welding robots, material handling…
Visit robots.comWe analyzed Robots.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
robots.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value3,270 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.9 s
3/100
10%
78 ms
179 ms
346 ms
37 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Robots.com, 22% (9 requests) were made to Assets.robots.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (556 ms) relates to the external source Assets.robots.com.
Page size can be reduced by 322.5 kB (27%)
1.2 MB
859.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Robots.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 406.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 261.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 261.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Robots images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.7 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)
34
16
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robots. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
robots.com
78 ms
robots.com
179 ms
www.robots.com
346 ms
api.js
37 ms
app.css
101 ms
email-decode.min.js
9 ms
vendor.js
149 ms
manifest.js
147 ms
app.js
150 ms
pinit.js
17 ms
recaptcha__en.js
20 ms
gtm.js
163 ms
hero.webp
232 ms
T.I.E.-Logo-Arrowspng_148806ac74ef2e05e36dcb5cc55d8c09.jpg
306 ms
stars-bg_d21e9fb2d88b41d7f9ca170234d20f26.jpg
553 ms
Robotic-Flash-Removal-Extrusion-Blow-Molded-Components_c6c176117450a13d2d8ebff3daaaa169.jpg
553 ms
FANUC_Force_Control_and_Vision_Robot_c6c176117450a13d2d8ebff3daaaa169.jpg
301 ms
industrial-robots_c6c176117450a13d2d8ebff3daaaa169.jpg
554 ms
Welding_Robots_With_Rotational_Positioner_c6c176117450a13d2d8ebff3daaaa169.jpg
304 ms
Motoman_AccuFastII_Weld_Software_c6c176117450a13d2d8ebff3daaaa169.jpg
554 ms
Welding_Robots_In_Workcell_c6c176117450a13d2d8ebff3daaaa169.jpg
556 ms
logo-dark.webp
156 ms
logo-light.webp
110 ms
Inter-VariableFont_slnt,wght.ttf
488 ms
pinit_main.js
14 ms
js
123 ms
destination
120 ms
insight.min.js
64 ms
analytics.js
70 ms
destination
112 ms
hotjar-3542224.js
364 ms
112327.js
109 ms
collect
257 ms
226 ms
195 ms
collect
71 ms
modules.1a30a0a67c3c23c13060.js
50 ms
22 ms
18 ms
ga-audiences
70 ms
47 ms
robots.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
robots.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
robots.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Robots.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Robots.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
robots.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Robots. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: