Tools & Wizards About Us
rocafiel.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rocafiel.net

GMG联盟业务_gmg邀请码

Page Load Speed

894 ms in total

First Response

341 ms

Resources Loaded

428 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

rocafiel.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rocafiel.net now to see the best up-to-date Rocafiel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rocafiel.net

GMG联盟业务

Visit rocafiel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rocafiel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 341 ms and then it took 553 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rocafiel.net performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rocafiel.net

341 ms

jquery.min.js

21 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

14 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

16 ms

caption.js

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Rocafiel.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Rocafiel.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 621.7 kB (78%)

Content Size

800.4 kB

After Optimization

178.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rocafiel.net main page is 800.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 449.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 14.3 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rocafiel needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 336.8 kB

  • Original 449.9 kB
  • After minification 433.8 kB
  • After compression 113.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 336.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 258.1 kB

  • Original 307.9 kB
  • After minification 276.8 kB
  • After compression 49.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rocafiel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 258.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (78%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocafiel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rocafiel.net

rocafiel.net

341 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

21 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

14 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

16 ms

caption.js

caption.js

15 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

16 ms

jquery.ui.core.min.js

jquery.ui.core.min.js

17 ms

jquery.ui.sortable.min.js

jquery.ui.sortable.min.js

56 ms

jquery-ui-addons.js

jquery-ui-addons.js

61 ms

bootstrap-default-min.css

bootstrap-default-min.css

60 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

58 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

56 ms

css

css

58 ms

s5_flex_menu-min.js

s5_flex_menu-min.js

88 ms

s5_flex_menu.css

s5_flex_menu.css

59 ms

system.css

system.css

59 ms

general.css

general.css

90 ms

template_default.css

template_default.css

92 ms

template.css

template.css

91 ms

com_content.css

com_content.css

94 ms

editor.css

editor.css

96 ms

thirdparty.css

thirdparty.css

98 ms

css

css

97 ms

multibox.css

multibox.css

100 ms

ajax.css

ajax.css

100 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

101 ms

multibox.js

multibox.js

102 ms

s5_responsive_bars-min.css

s5_responsive_bars-min.css

101 ms

s5_responsive_hide_classes-min.css

s5_responsive_hide_classes-min.css

103 ms

s5_responsive.css

s5_responsive.css

104 ms

custom.css

custom.css

101 ms

s5_info_slide-min.css

s5_info_slide-min.css

104 ms

s5_info_slide-min.js

s5_info_slide-min.js

105 ms

s5_columns_equalizer-min.js

s5_columns_equalizer-min.js

104 ms

css

css

102 ms

css

css

101 ms

s5_responsive_mobile_bar-min.js

s5_responsive_mobile_bar-min.js

104 ms

system.css

system.css

24 ms

footerback.jpg

footerback.jpg

9 ms

menu_light.png

menu_light.png

10 ms

search_light.png

search_light.png

13 ms

s5_logo.png

s5_logo.png

12 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

10 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

12 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

15 ms

rss.png

rss.png

14 ms

s5_toparrow.png

s5_toparrow.png

16 ms

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

11 ms

HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

12 ms

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

14 ms

Accessibility Review

rocafiel.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

rocafiel.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rocafiel.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rocafiel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rocafiel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rocafiel.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rocafiel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: