Tools & Wizards About Us
rockinghamgolf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rockinghamgolf.com

Rockingham Country Club - Newmarket, NH

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

rockinghamgolf.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rockingham Golf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rockinghamgolf.com

Rockingham Country Club - Newmarket, NH

Visit rockinghamgolf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockinghamgolf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockinghamgolf.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rockinghamgolf.com

162 ms

www.rockinghamgolf.com

873 ms

widgetkit-77ad1a2b-bd9dc01b.css

31 ms

jcemediabox.min.css

58 ms

jquery.min-32c6bb74.js

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rockinghamgolf.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rockinghamgolf.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 20.5 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockingham Golf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 176.3 kB
  • After minification 176.3 kB
  • After compression 144.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 59.3 kB
  • After minification 59.3 kB
  • After compression 58.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockinghamgolf.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (39%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockingham Golf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rockinghamgolf.com

rockinghamgolf.com

162 ms

www.rockinghamgolf.com

www.rockinghamgolf.com

873 ms

widgetkit-77ad1a2b-bd9dc01b.css

widgetkit-77ad1a2b-bd9dc01b.css

31 ms

jcemediabox.min.css

jcemediabox.min.css

58 ms

jquery.min-32c6bb74.js

jquery.min-32c6bb74.js

102 ms

jquery-noconflict-6b190f55.js

jquery-noconflict-6b190f55.js

74 ms

jquery-migrate.min-11d11b15.js

jquery-migrate.min-11d11b15.js

75 ms

widgetkit-60fb272b-673e75da.js

widgetkit-60fb272b-673e75da.js

74 ms

jcemediabox.min.js

jcemediabox.min.js

98 ms

bootstrap.min-a6fc69e0.js

bootstrap.min-a6fc69e0.js

86 ms

bootstrap-2b8ec50f.css

bootstrap-2b8ec50f.css

143 ms

theme-16485d73.css

theme-16485d73.css

133 ms

theme-621e5ee4.js

theme-621e5ee4.js

131 ms

css

css

38 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

35 ms

mediaelement-and-player.js

mediaelement-and-player.js

1062 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

31 ms

css

css

27 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

1343 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

1225 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

357 ms

page_bg.jpg

page_bg.jpg

389 ms

logo_new12.png

logo_new12.png

320 ms

header_bg.jpg

header_bg.jpg

320 ms

menu_bg.jpg

menu_bg.jpg

374 ms

emaillogo.jpg

emaillogo.jpg

320 ms

superam.jpg

superam.jpg

453 ms

Goler12.jpg

Goler12.jpg

431 ms

contact.jpg

contact.jpg

373 ms

Golf.jpg

Golf.jpg

374 ms

FPagePizza.jpg

FPagePizza.jpg

412 ms

EventButton1.jpg

EventButton1.jpg

412 ms

footer_bg.jpg

footer_bg.jpg

388 ms

close.png

close.png

414 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

415 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

374 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

374 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

387 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

391 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

334 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

708 ms

neIIzCemt4A5qa7mv5WBFqk.ttf

neIIzCemt4A5qa7mv5WBFqk.ttf

401 ms

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCA.ttf

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCA.ttf

401 ms

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-jHgfY3lCA.ttf

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-jHgfY3lCA.ttf

399 ms

collect

collect

53 ms

banner_2.jpg

banner_2.jpg

167 ms

night-view-slide2.jpg

night-view-slide2.jpg

127 ms

banner_1.jpg

banner_1.jpg

170 ms

js

js

78 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

299 ms

Accessibility Review

rockinghamgolf.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rockinghamgolf.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rockinghamgolf.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockinghamgolf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockinghamgolf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rockinghamgolf.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockingham Golf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: