Tools & Wizards About Us
rockofafrica.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

rockofafrica.org

ROCK of Africa | Delivering HOPE to Africa

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

127 ms

rockofafrica.org screenshot

About Website

Visit rockofafrica.org now to see the best up-to-date ROCK Of Africa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rockofafrica.org

A Christian relief effort helping people in a crisis of disease, famine and poverty in sub-Sarahan Africa.

Visit rockofafrica.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockofafrica.org page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockofafrica.org performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.209

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rockofafrica.org

206 ms

rockofafrica.org

392 ms

prettyPhoto.css

91 ms

flexslider.css

170 ms

style.css

221 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Rockofafrica.org, 11% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (943 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockofafrica.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 232.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rockofafrica.org main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.0 kB

  • Original 29.4 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 201.7 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ROCK Of Africa images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 238.8 kB
  • After minification 238.8 kB
  • After compression 233.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 76.1 kB
  • After minification 76.1 kB
  • After compression 73.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockofafrica.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (27%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

47

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ROCK Of Africa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rockofafrica.org

rockofafrica.org

206 ms

rockofafrica.org

rockofafrica.org

392 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

91 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

170 ms

style.css

style.css

221 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

297 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

228 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js

228 ms

all-in-one-min.js

all-in-one-min.js

449 ms

setup.js

setup.js

264 ms

main.js

main.js

331 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

91 ms

logo.png

logo.png

161 ms

mother-child.png

mother-child.png

463 ms

fslide02.jpg

fslide02.jpg

464 ms

fslide01--.jpg

fslide01--.jpg

218 ms

fslide00.jpg

fslide00.jpg

510 ms

fslide29.jpg

fslide29.jpg

510 ms

fslide03.jpg

fslide03.jpg

510 ms

fslide04.jpg

fslide04.jpg

511 ms

fslide36.jpg

fslide36.jpg

603 ms

fslide08.jpg

fslide08.jpg

603 ms

fslide09.jpg

fslide09.jpg

604 ms

fslide10.jpg

fslide10.jpg

603 ms

fslide11.jpg

fslide11.jpg

603 ms

fslide12.jpg

fslide12.jpg

646 ms

fslide01b.jpg

fslide01b.jpg

750 ms

fslide16.jpg

fslide16.jpg

645 ms

fslide17.jpg

fslide17.jpg

668 ms

fslide18.jpg

fslide18.jpg

667 ms

fslide19.jpg

fslide19.jpg

613 ms

fslide20.jpg

fslide20.jpg

751 ms

fslide77.jpg

fslide77.jpg

752 ms

fslide21.jpg

fslide21.jpg

751 ms

fslide22.jpg

fslide22.jpg

856 ms

fslide23.jpg

fslide23.jpg

856 ms

fslide24.jpg

fslide24.jpg

857 ms

fslide25.jpg

fslide25.jpg

855 ms

fslide26.jpg

fslide26.jpg

856 ms

code-icon.png

code-icon.png

855 ms

intuitive-icon.png

intuitive-icon.png

943 ms

ROCKlogo-wShadow-lt-50.png

ROCKlogo-wShadow-lt-50.png

942 ms

all.js

all.js

46 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

942 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

61 ms

AN5vMqK9PyU

AN5vMqK9PyU

23 ms

oZxDDIwI36U

oZxDDIwI36U

24 ms

banner-bg.jpg

banner-bg.jpg

908 ms

AN5vMqK9PyU

AN5vMqK9PyU

124 ms

oZxDDIwI36U

oZxDDIwI36U

469 ms

menu_down_arrow.png

menu_down_arrow.png

900 ms

all.js

all.js

8 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

18 ms

settings

settings

356 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

33 ms

base.js

base.js

58 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

298 ms

XSOeYOgfx9Jh0OnrBRoGZITK3RITQeOfJZOsiQTg9Ss.js

XSOeYOgfx9Jh0OnrBRoGZITK3RITQeOfJZOsiQTg9Ss.js

236 ms

embed.js

embed.js

148 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

75 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

142 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

142 ms

id

id

54 ms

embeds

embeds

109 ms

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

24 ms

Create

Create

194 ms

Create

Create

274 ms

bg_control_nav.png

bg_control_nav.png

95 ms

bg_direction_nav.png

bg_direction_nav.png

95 ms

Accessibility Review

rockofafrica.org accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rockofafrica.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rockofafrica.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockofafrica.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockofafrica.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rockofafrica.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ROCK Of Africa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: