Tools & Wizards About Us
rocksplitter.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

rocksplitter.in

Shrikrishna Agro Equipment Pvt. Ltd, Pune | Hydraulic Equipment Manufacturers.

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

621 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

926 ms

rocksplitter.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rocksplitter.in homepage info - get ready to check Rocksplitter best content right away, or after learning these important things about rocksplitter.in

Shri krishna Group, Pune- All types of Hydraulic cutter machine,Portable ventilation fan,Dewatering pump,Electric Power pack,Hydraulic Rock Splitter and Hydraulic cutter manufacturer ,we also manufact...

Visit rocksplitter.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rocksplitter.in page load time and found that the first response time was 621 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rocksplitter.in performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.02

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rocksplitter.in

621 ms

rocksplitter.in

867 ms

bootstrap.min.css

428 ms

fontawesome.css

590 ms

flaticon.css

600 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Rocksplitter.in, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rocksplitter.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rocksplitter.in main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 69.5 kB

  • Original 79.3 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rocksplitter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 339.6 kB
  • After minification 339.6 kB
  • After compression 334.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 97.9 kB
  • After minification 97.9 kB
  • After compression 87.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rocksplitter.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (43%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

51

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocksplitter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rocksplitter.in

rocksplitter.in

621 ms

rocksplitter.in

rocksplitter.in

867 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

428 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

590 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

600 ms

pbminfotech-base-icons.css

pbminfotech-base-icons.css

607 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

603 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

668 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

671 ms

aos.css

aos.css

780 ms

shortcode.css

shortcode.css

979 ms

base.css

base.css

813 ms

style.css

style.css

816 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

900 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

909 ms

js

js

78 ms

feedback-1.css

feedback-1.css

1067 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1218 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1091 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1369 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

1166 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

1182 ms

numinate.min.js

numinate.min.js

1201 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1423 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1370 ms

circle-progress.js

circle-progress.js

1375 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

1395 ms

aos.js

aos.js

1431 ms

gsap.js

gsap.js

1624 ms

ScrollTrigger.js

ScrollTrigger.js

1610 ms

SplitText.js

SplitText.js

1613 ms

cursor.js

cursor.js

1616 ms

magnetic.js

magnetic.js

1633 ms

gsap-animation.js

gsap-animation.js

1636 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1835 ms

rslider.js

rslider.js

1867 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

2059 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

2085 ms

css2

css2

30 ms

css2

css2

47 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

css2

css2

52 ms

css2

css2

53 ms

logo.png

logo.png

883 ms

slider-n3.jpg

slider-n3.jpg

1438 ms

slider-n1.jpg

slider-n1.jpg

1661 ms

slider-n2.jpg

slider-n2.jpg

1619 ms

About-us-home.jpg

About-us-home.jpg

1475 ms

home-about-2.jpg

home-about-2.jpg

1521 ms

hydralicsplitterphompp.jpg

hydralicsplitterphompp.jpg

1542 ms

hydralic-rocksplitterprodct.jpg

hydralic-rocksplitterprodct.jpg

1644 ms

homeprod3.jpg

homeprod3.jpg

1681 ms

fid-bg1.png

fid-bg1.png

1715 ms

home-rescue-1.jpg

home-rescue-1.jpg

1780 ms

home-rescue-2.jpg

home-rescue-2.jpg

1812 ms

home-rescue-3.jpg

home-rescue-3.jpg

1865 ms

home-rescue-4.jpg

home-rescue-4.jpg

1862 ms

home-rescue-5.jpg

home-rescue-5.jpg

1833 ms

pbminfotech-base-icons2e9e.woff

pbminfotech-base-icons2e9e.woff

1837 ms

font

font

14 ms

font

font

158 ms

font

font

46 ms

Flaticon23ae.ttf

Flaticon23ae.ttf

1851 ms

home-rescue-6.jpg

home-rescue-6.jpg

1836 ms

home-rescue-7.jpg

home-rescue-7.jpg

1884 ms

home-rescue-8.jpg

home-rescue-8.jpg

1896 ms

home-rescue-9.jpg

home-rescue-9.jpg

1758 ms

rattings.png

rattings.png

1798 ms

clientsn1-1.png

clientsn1-1.png

1870 ms

clientsn1-2.png

clientsn1-2.png

1816 ms

clientsn1-4.png

clientsn1-4.png

1877 ms

clientsn1-3.png

clientsn1-3.png

1889 ms

clientsn1-5.png

clientsn1-5.png

1739 ms

clientsn1-6.png

clientsn1-6.png

1771 ms

clientsn1-7.png

clientsn1-7.png

1798 ms

clientsn1-8.png

clientsn1-8.png

1840 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1913 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1925 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

1746 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1745 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1728 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

1625 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

1643 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

1311 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

1304 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

1301 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

1261 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

1302 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

1295 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

1292 ms

15.jpg

15.jpg

1303 ms

16.jpg

16.jpg

1284 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

1259 ms

activebit-white.png

activebit-white.png

1339 ms

dealer-icon.png

dealer-icon.png

1273 ms

call-now-icon.png

call-now-icon.png

1241 ms

whatsapp-icon.png

whatsapp-icon.png

1250 ms

Mumbai-exbination.jpeg

Mumbai-exbination.jpeg

1247 ms

Accessibility Review

rocksplitter.in accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rocksplitter.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rocksplitter.in SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rocksplitter.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rocksplitter.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rocksplitter.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rocksplitter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: