1.9 sec in total
136 ms
1.3 sec
459 ms
Visit rockwoodflooring.org now to see the best up-to-date Rockwood Flooring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rockwoodflooring.org
Visit rockwoodflooring.orgWe analyzed Rockwoodflooring.org page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rockwoodflooring.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value3.5 s
89/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
136 ms
76 ms
69 ms
111 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Rockwoodflooring.org, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (793 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockwoodflooring.org.
Page size can be reduced by 258.3 kB (11%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rockwoodflooring.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockwood Flooring images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockwoodflooring.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (84%)
44
7
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockwood Flooring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rockwoodflooring.org
136 ms
frontend.min.css
76 ms
menu-animation.min.css
69 ms
woocommerce-layout.min.css
111 ms
woocommerce.min.css
129 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
65 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
152 ms
swiper.min.css
94 ms
post-948.css
98 ms
all.min.css
126 ms
v4-shims.min.css
132 ms
post-340.css
135 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
144 ms
regular.min.css
149 ms
jquery.min.js
234 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
208 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
185 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
190 ms
js.cookie.min.js
185 ms
woocommerce.min.js
191 ms
v4-shims.min.js
224 ms
animations.min.css
224 ms
frontend.min.js
306 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
227 ms
order-attribution.min.js
309 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
309 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
311 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
330 ms
dom-ready.min.js
313 ms
main.js
309 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
317 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
350 ms
waypoints.min.js
348 ms
core.min.js
349 ms
frontend.min.js
353 ms
underscore.min.js
355 ms
wp-util.min.js
387 ms
frontend.min.js
338 ms
cropped-Black-rockwood-logo-120x66.png
146 ms
oakImage-1578002347173-superJumbo-1.jpg
298 ms
Screenshot-2022-04-29-at-4.56.21-PM-708x1024.jpg
218 ms
2019-03-26-768x768.png
793 ms
2022-04-23-1-768x768.jpg
234 ms
Rockwell-Bold.ttf
145 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
163 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
231 ms
eicons.woff
283 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.min.css
65 ms
rockwoodflooring.org accessibility score
rockwoodflooring.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rockwoodflooring.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockwoodflooring.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockwoodflooring.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rockwoodflooring.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockwood Flooring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: