Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

rockymountainradar.com

Rocky Mountain Radar - Home of the best radar detector and scrambler! – rockymountainradar

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

595 ms

rockymountainradar.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rockymountainradar.com homepage info - get ready to check Rocky Mountain Radar best content right away, or after learning these important things about rockymountainradar.com

Welcome to Rocky Mountain Radar. Discover the ultimate companion for a hassle-free and confident driving experience. With our radar detectors, you can stay one step ahead of speed traps, red light cam...

Visit rockymountainradar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockymountainradar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockymountainradar.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,780 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rockymountainradar.com

43 ms

rockymountainradar.com

78 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

39 ms

css

82 ms

style.min.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Rockymountainradar.com, 9% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rockymountainradar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 516.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Rockymountainradar.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 993.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 245.9 kB

  • Original 299.6 kB
  • After minification 298.9 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 245.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 993.5 kB
  • After minification 977.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rocky Mountain Radar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 254.6 kB

  • Original 792.6 kB
  • After minification 792.6 kB
  • After compression 537.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.6 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 93 B

  • Original 216.5 kB
  • After minification 216.5 kB
  • After compression 216.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockymountainradar.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (73%)

Requests Now

107

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocky Mountain Radar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 57 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rockymountainradar.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rockymountainradar.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rockymountainradar.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockymountainradar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockymountainradar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rocky Mountain Radar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: