Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

rockymountainradar.com

Rocky Mountain Radar - The Best Radar Detector On The Market

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

152 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

780 ms

rockymountainradar.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rockymountainradar.com homepage info - get ready to check Rocky Mountain Radar best content right away, or after learning these important things about rockymountainradar.com

There is only one undisputed technology leader in radar detection. With the power of the best radar detector on the market, you can avoid speeding tickets thanks to Rocky Mountain Radar and our innova...

Visit rockymountainradar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rockymountainradar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rockymountainradar.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,070 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rockymountainradar.com

152 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

17 ms

css

41 ms

style.min.css

41 ms

vendors-style.css

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Rockymountainradar.com, 8% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockymountainradar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 597.9 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Rockymountainradar.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 993.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 245.1 kB

  • Original 298.5 kB
  • After minification 297.8 kB
  • After compression 53.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 245.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 993.5 kB
  • After minification 977.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rocky Mountain Radar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

  • Original 285.8 kB
  • After minification 285.8 kB
  • After compression 260.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 311.9 kB

  • Original 525.9 kB
  • After minification 525.7 kB
  • After compression 214.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockymountainradar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.9 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (73%)

Requests Now

108

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocky Mountain Radar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rockymountainradar.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rockymountainradar.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rockymountainradar.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockymountainradar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockymountainradar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rocky Mountain Radar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: