Tools & Wizards About Us
rollupproject.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rollupproject.com

Roll Up Project - a display space for artists, by artists

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

730 ms

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

rollupproject.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rollupproject.com now to see the best up-to-date Roll Up Project content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rollupproject.com

Roll Up Project is a window gallery in Oakland's Jack London District. Roll up or walk by and see what's new. We feature Bay Area artists.

Visit rollupproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rollupproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rollupproject.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.2 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rollupproject.com

45 ms

www.rollupproject.com

47 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

15 ms

style.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Rollupproject.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (251 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 409.8 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rollupproject.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 110.2 kB

  • Original 132.2 kB
  • After minification 128.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 53.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roll Up Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 512.6 kB
  • After minification 512.6 kB
  • After compression 467.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 201.7 kB

  • Original 349.6 kB
  • After minification 347.7 kB
  • After compression 147.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rollupproject.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.7 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (79%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roll Up Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rollupproject.com

rollupproject.com

45 ms

www.rollupproject.com

www.rollupproject.com

47 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

15 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

styles.css

33 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

18 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

25 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

34 ms

header-perma-transparent.css

header-perma-transparent.css

47 ms

caroufredsel.css

caroufredsel.css

52 ms

cf7.css

cf7.css

52 ms

css

css

85 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

52 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

47 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

49 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

66 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

68 ms

css

css

54 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

76 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

77 ms

js

js

251 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

74 ms

css

css

181 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

74 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

79 ms

core.css

core.css

176 ms

fullscreen-legacy.css

fullscreen-legacy.css

78 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

176 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

178 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

178 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

213 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

214 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

211 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

212 ms

wpss-search-suggest.js

wpss-search-suggest.js

211 ms

index.js

index.js

211 ms

index.js

index.js

217 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

216 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

220 ms

salient-portfolio.js

salient-portfolio.js

219 ms

api.js

api.js

233 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

214 ms

caroufredsel.min.js

caroufredsel.min.js

224 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

216 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

211 ms

priority.js

priority.js

211 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

213 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

204 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

203 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

198 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

195 ms

vivus.min.js

vivus.min.js

196 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

197 ms

init.js

init.js

198 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

193 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

171 ms

index.js

index.js

170 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

171 ms

sbi-scripts.min.js

sbi-scripts.min.js

172 ms

forms.js

forms.js

172 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

126 ms

RollUp_logo_draft2_white.png

RollUp_logo_draft2_white.png

126 ms

RollUp_logo_draft2.png

RollUp_logo_draft2.png

126 ms

rollupproject_door_2.jpg

rollupproject_door_2.jpg

126 ms

RollUpProject_DavidJohnsonPatrickCant.jpg

RollUpProject_DavidJohnsonPatrickCant.jpg

129 ms

RUP_Catalogue_2023-e1678488081745.jpg

RUP_Catalogue_2023-e1678488081745.jpg

125 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

127 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

128 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

129 ms

CynthiaSpillman_RollUpProject_WindEye_2022-600x403.webp

CynthiaSpillman_RollUpProject_WindEye_2022-600x403.webp

125 ms

CateWhite_RollUpProject_NatureMan_sm-600x403.jpg

CateWhite_RollUpProject_NatureMan_sm-600x403.jpg

98 ms

CherylWard_RollUpProject_9-600x403.jpg

CherylWard_RollUpProject_9-600x403.jpg

97 ms

MariaGuzmanCapron_RollUpProject_atardecer-600x403.jpg

MariaGuzmanCapron_RollUpProject_atardecer-600x403.jpg

97 ms

ArthurENelson_RollUpProject_header-600x403.jpg

ArthurENelson_RollUpProject_header-600x403.jpg

98 ms

pt_4323_Home_2020-600x403.jpg

pt_4323_Home_2020-600x403.jpg

95 ms

placeholder.png

placeholder.png

95 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

161 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

187 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

187 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

186 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

186 ms

nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_A.ttf

nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_A.ttf

43 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

43 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

112 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

166 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

28 ms

Accessibility Review

rollupproject.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rollupproject.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rollupproject.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rollupproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rollupproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rollupproject.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roll Up Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: