Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

roofplace.ru

Устройство кровли - технология устройства кровли и кровельные материалы, технологические карты, стоимость и цена работы

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

633 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

roofplace.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit roofplace.ru now to see the best up-to-date Roofplace content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roofplace.ru

Чтобы правильно понять устройство кровли, необходимо выяснить, какие виды крыш существуют. Это не только поможет выбрать кровельные материалы, но и верно подобрать сопутствующие материалы для кровли

Visit roofplace.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Roofplace.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 633 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roofplace.ru performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50,380 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.362

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value64.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roofplace.ru

633 ms

lightgallery.css

386 ms

bootstrap-grid-3.3.1.min.css

385 ms

font-awesome.min.css

385 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

385 ms

Our browser made a total of 172 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Roofplace.ru, 24% (41 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (16 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Connect.mail.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 152.9 kB (17%)

Content Size

906.6 kB

After Optimization

753.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Roofplace.ru main page is 906.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 495.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 80.4 kB

  • Original 101.6 kB
  • After minification 100.9 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 495.7 kB
  • After minification 485.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roofplace images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 62.2 kB

  • Original 309.4 kB
  • After minification 309.4 kB
  • After compression 247.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 94 (72%)

Requests Now

131

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 131 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roofplace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

roofplace.ru accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Best Practices

roofplace.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

roofplace.ru SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roofplace.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roofplace.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roofplace. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: