Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    47% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    96% of websites

rosediana.net

Rosediana Diary

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

734 ms

rosediana.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rosediana.net now to see the best up-to-date Rosediana content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rosediana.net

Spreading The Good Vibes

Visit rosediana.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rosediana.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rosediana.net performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,010 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.325

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rosediana.net

1306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

style.css

111 ms

css

61 ms

style.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 182 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Rosediana.net, 10% (18 requests) were made to Abs.twimg.com and 5% (10 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rosediana.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 529.9 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Rosediana.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 62.3 kB

  • Original 79.5 kB
  • After minification 75.2 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rosediana images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 300.5 kB

  • Original 451.9 kB
  • After minification 439.9 kB
  • After compression 151.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 300.5 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 137.4 kB

  • Original 157.6 kB
  • After minification 129.0 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rosediana.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 137.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 103 (61%)

Requests Now

169

After Optimization

66

The browser has sent 169 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rosediana. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rosediana.net accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rosediana.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rosediana.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rosediana.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rosediana.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rosediana. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: