1.6 sec in total
246 ms
996 ms
366 ms
Visit ross.construction now to see the best up-to-date Ross content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ross.construction
Visit ross.constructionWe analyzed Ross.construction page load time and found that the first response time was 246 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
ross.construction performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value2,370 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
246 ms
108 ms
158 ms
224 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Ross.construction, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (499 ms) belongs to the original domain Ross.construction.
Page size can be reduced by 91.2 kB (4%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ross.construction main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 364 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ross images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ross.construction has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (63%)
46
17
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ross. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ross.construction
246 ms
cal4z.css
108 ms
cal4z.css
158 ms
cal4z.css
224 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
107 ms
cal50.js
223 ms
js
93 ms
css
16 ms
index.js
71 ms
index.js
114 ms
core.min.js
116 ms
mouse.min.js
124 ms
sortable.min.js
164 ms
tabs.min.js
169 ms
accordion.min.js
171 ms
plugins.js
295 ms
menu.js
242 ms
animations.min.js
243 ms
jplayer.min.js
244 ms
translate3d.js
244 ms
smoothscroll.js
244 ms
scripts.js
292 ms
comment-reply.min.js
292 ms
api.js
38 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
292 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
293 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
342 ms
index.js
363 ms
ross-bg.jpg
499 ms
ross-logo-big.png
242 ms
cover.png
135 ms
home-page-welcome.jpg
364 ms
flouret.png
135 ms
253_IMAG0215.jpg
241 ms
253_Scott_Pictures_to_7-13-07_082.png
242 ms
front-sign.jpg
315 ms
js
100 ms
analytics.js
93 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
34 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
127 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
139 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
139 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
139 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
139 ms
mfn-icons.woff
245 ms
recaptcha__en.js
148 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
181 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
176 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
230 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
231 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
237 ms
collect
55 ms
cover-100x50.png
55 ms
ross.construction accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ross.construction best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ross.construction SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ross.construction can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ross.construction main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ross.construction
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ross. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: