Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

rotolight.com

Rotolight | Advanced LED Lighting for Photography & Filmmaking

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

310 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

334 ms

rotolight.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rotolight.com now to see the best up-to-date Rotolight content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rotolight.com

Rotolight: are innovators in Cutting-Edge LED Lighting Solutions in Photography and Filmmaking. Elevate your creative projects with our state-of-the-art technology including the NEO 3 PRO, AEOS 2 PRO,...

Visit rotolight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rotolight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rotolight.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,650 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rotolight.com

310 ms

www.rotolight.com

244 ms

www.rotolight.com

4484 ms

autoptimize_7dfbf1713bae1ba18639c1664fdea4c6.css

649 ms

autoptimize_0a35f9b4c40d5625e1f5a713ab93c844.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Rotolight.com, 63% (80 requests) were made to 1x4kyc3atahw1gz2au3h0q5a-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com and 9% (11 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rotolight.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (53%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Rotolight.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 919.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 101.2 kB
  • After minification 99.5 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 708.4 kB
  • After minification 672.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rotolight images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 623.8 kB

  • Original 919.3 kB
  • After minification 853.0 kB
  • After compression 295.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 623.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 452.8 kB

  • Original 529.5 kB
  • After minification 525.9 kB
  • After compression 76.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rotolight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 452.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (62%)

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rotolight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rotolight.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rotolight.com best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rotolight.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rotolight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rotolight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rotolight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: