6 sec in total
511 ms
4 sec
1.5 sec
Visit rottmann.net now to see the best up-to-date Rottmann content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rottmann.net
Visit rottmann.netWe analyzed Rottmann.net page load time and found that the first response time was 511 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rottmann.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
100/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
511 ms
215 ms
332 ms
336 ms
548 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rottmann.net, 20% (25 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (11 requests) were made to Button.flattr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rottmann.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (49%)
2.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Rottmann.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rottmann needs image optimization as it can save up to 117.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 860.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 860.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rottmann.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.6 kB or 54% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (51%)
120
59
The browser has sent 120 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rottmann. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rottmann.net
511 ms
style.css
215 ms
grid.css
332 ms
base.css
336 ms
layout.css
548 ms
slideshow.css
336 ms
shortcodes.css
538 ms
prettyPhoto.css
650 ms
css
37 ms
bootstrap.css
1082 ms
jquery.js
1101 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
667 ms
avia.js
1169 ms
audio-player.js
964 ms
plusone.js
66 ms
custom.css
777 ms
9693398.js
61 ms
5983581.js
71 ms
embed.js
55 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
888 ms
aviapoly.js
1342 ms
facebook_awd.js
1006 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
883 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
22 ms
rottnann_net_2013_logo.png
269 ms
icon-twitter.png
197 ms
icon-facebook.png
220 ms
icon-gplus.png
222 ms
icon-linkedin.png
526 ms
icon-rss.png
528 ms
loading.gif
525 ms
rottmann_net1.jpg
729 ms
icon-post-format-standard.png
688 ms
bumper-765x415.png
1159 ms
app.yaml_.png
1060 ms
etl.yaml_.png
1119 ms
gopher-765x415.png
1552 ms
ghost-first.jpg
1300 ms
agile.jpg
1182 ms
svbtle.jpg
1688 ms
GoogleIO2013-004.jpg
2165 ms
logo.png
1829 ms
Google-Plus-Communities.jpg
1708 ms
learn.jpg
1969 ms
ralf-on-svbtle.jpg
1769 ms
widgets.js
36 ms
xgzbb53t8j-Mo-vYa23n5onF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
30 ms
gist-embed-7346e9a735aaeeacede51d1efaad6208f95d9edbc222155878bfddc2da28fa87.css
107 ms
like.php
244 ms
icon-post-format-link.png
1731 ms
like.php
344 ms
icon-search.png
1722 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
adn.js
102 ms
like.php
305 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
73 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
90 ms
fastbutton
259 ms
fastbutton
252 ms
fastbutton
283 ms
fastbutton
246 ms
fastbutton
280 ms
fastbutton
276 ms
fastbutton
363 ms
fastbutton
355 ms
fastbutton
356 ms
fastbutton
353 ms
person
557 ms
collect
37 ms
like.php
243 ms
like.php
350 ms
like.php
403 ms
like.php
395 ms
like.php
391 ms
like.php
399 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
780 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
831 ms
like.php
373 ms
postmessageRelay
343 ms
load.js
177 ms
all.js
449 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
229 ms
button.html
322 ms
2764.png
228 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw
46 ms
loader.js
151 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
145 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
145 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
234 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
164 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
139 ms
350 ms
348 ms
348 ms
348 ms
373 ms
370 ms
537 ms
493 ms
512 ms
487 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
48 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
83 ms
app_d99865da43.css
83 ms
jquery.min.js
143 ms
app_11c38f025d.js
122 ms
rs=AGLTcCPxxcsaEHPLIxgGb9au86GYFsrXHA
86 ms
rs=AGLTcCPeW_yxohM6d2vzOu9_v18SNdO9Aw
32 ms
rs=AGLTcCNyaaduUvqXSD4CReLtqUtlnUcqnQ
34 ms
icons.data.svg_12a7ae29ed.css
30 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
7 ms
photo.jpg
171 ms
ibiza_cover.jpg
170 ms
rs=AGLTcCNyaaduUvqXSD4CReLtqUtlnUcqnQ
44 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
63 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
96 ms
cloudflare.min.js
66 ms
button.css
763 ms
button.js
641 ms
rs=AGLTcCNyaaduUvqXSD4CReLtqUtlnUcqnQ
20 ms
jot.html
2 ms
embed
113 ms
embed-frame-base.LhKTDMG5EMUNj2D2gyEhfw.css
76 ms
fonts-base.by5Oi_VbnwEIvhnWIsuUjA.css
83 ms
embed-frame.bundle.GwRIW9FuoxMhI7lDV5Yueg.js
78 ms
icons.eR1AJ_5I759hGrg36Jtvbg.js
77 ms
rottmann.net accessibility score
rottmann.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
rottmann.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rottmann.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rottmann.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rottmann.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rottmann. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: