1.9 sec in total
175 ms
1.6 sec
112 ms
Visit routerank.com now to see the best up-to-date RouteRANK content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about routerank.com
{{'A travel search engine which combines car, plane and train routes and computes the carbon dioxide emissions, price and travel time for each journey.' | translate}}
Visit routerank.comWe analyzed Routerank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
routerank.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value3,340 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value15.8 s
6/100
10%
175 ms
277 ms
153 ms
161 ms
243 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Routerank.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (862 ms) belongs to the original domain Routerank.com.
Page size can be reduced by 810.5 kB (67%)
1.2 MB
393.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Routerank.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 923.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RouteRANK needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 653.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 653.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Routerank.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (69%)
49
15
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RouteRANK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
175 ms
jquery.timepicker.css
277 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
153 ms
reset.css
161 ms
styles.css
243 ms
rr-calendar.css
163 ms
rrCustom.css
256 ms
baseSearchBox.css
227 ms
returnTripsSearchBox.css
240 ms
window.css
243 ms
nonads.css
301 ms
12box.css
320 ms
text-en-ch.js
415 ms
ext-base3.2.1.js
405 ms
ext-custom3.2.1.js
862 ms
ext.rrg.js
473 ms
standard.js
546 ms
console-shim.min.js
399 ms
jquery.min.js
682 ms
jquery.timepicker.min.js
484 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
494 ms
searchBoxComplete.js
641 ms
plusone.js
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
45 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
background.png
87 ms
logo.png
89 ms
Datum.gif
88 ms
plus_minus-button.gif
86 ms
forwardArrow.gif
87 ms
loading.gif
76 ms
addTwitter.png
152 ms
addFacebook.png
165 ms
addNewsletter.png
164 ms
suitcase.gif
166 ms
globe.gif
165 ms
homeLeaf.png
171 ms
homeIcon.png
225 ms
otv.png
324 ms
TR35.png
324 ms
tcs.gif
245 ms
BOSW.png
244 ms
interfaceBg3.png
314 ms
bigButton_cap.png
273 ms
bigButton_body.png
377 ms
colOpenBg.png
297 ms
colOpenBgGreen.png
348 ms
col1_2a_Bg.gif
375 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
49 ms
routerank.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
routerank.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
routerank.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Routerank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Routerank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
routerank.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RouteRANK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: