1.2 sec in total
94 ms
1 sec
140 ms
Click here to check amazing Royalburton content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about royalburton.com
Contract distributors of major kitchen appliances. In Business for over 40 years and 65 years respectively.
Visit royalburton.comWe analyzed Royalburton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
royalburton.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.32
36/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
94 ms
91 ms
230 ms
35 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Royalburton.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (311 ms) belongs to the original domain Royalburton.com.
Page size can be reduced by 191.3 kB (15%)
1.3 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Royalburton.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 743.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Royalburton needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalburton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (50%)
50
25
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royalburton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royalburton.com
94 ms
www.royalburton.com
91 ms
www.royalburton.com
230 ms
slideshow.css
35 ms
jquery-ui.css
26 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
33 ms
Main.css
74 ms
ddsmoothmenu-v.css
108 ms
ddsmoothmenu-h.css
137 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
141 ms
jscript.js
142 ms
magnificent-popup.js
175 ms
magnific-popup.css
143 ms
tinyMCE.css
143 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
171 ms
ResponsiveGrid.css
179 ms
easing.js
178 ms
functions.js
181 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
180 ms
slicknav.min.js
204 ms
modernizr.min.js
209 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
218 ms
custom_0.css
220 ms
tinymce.min.js
311 ms
Sarnow.css
219 ms
WebResource.axd
235 ms
WebResource.axd
241 ms
addthis_widget.js
105 ms
logo.png
51 ms
lg_4570db_slide-4.jpg
149 ms
lg_f42474_Monogram%20Web%201.jpg
173 ms
lg_8a3ebc_gray-and-white-kitchen-range.jpg
215 ms
hoshizaki.png
52 ms
monogram.png
48 ms
frigidaire.png
89 ms
kitchenaid.png
88 ms
lg.png
88 ms
friedrich.png
123 ms
summit.png
124 ms
web-mfr-whirpool.png
125 ms
web-mfr-maytag.png
159 ms
web-mfr-marvel.png
159 ms
icon-facebook.png
160 ms
bg-header.png
185 ms
slideshow-shadow.png
189 ms
bg-footer.png
191 ms
ga.js
29 ms
arrow-left.png
152 ms
arrow-right.png
160 ms
ui.totop.png
176 ms
sqr721n-webfont.woff
186 ms
square-721-bold-bt-webfont.woff
197 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
acsb.js
47 ms
royalburton.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
royalburton.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
royalburton.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalburton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Royalburton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royalburton.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royalburton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: