15.9 sec in total
2.1 sec
9.4 sec
4.4 sec
Visit royaleretreat.in now to see the best up-to-date Royal E Retreat content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royaleretreat.in
Hotel Royal Retreat is one of the best 4 star luxury hotel in Shimla provides you the finest, luxurious hospitality services at good pricing.
Visit royaleretreat.inWe analyzed Royaleretreat.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 13.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
royaleretreat.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value24.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
2068 ms
241 ms
116 ms
470 ms
688 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Royaleretreat.in, 6% (7 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Royaleretreat.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (11%)
12.2 MB
10.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Royaleretreat.in main page is 12.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 265.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 265.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 986.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal E Retreat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.3 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royaleretreat.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (63%)
112
42
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal E Retreat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royaleretreat.in
2068 ms
frontend.min.css
241 ms
css
116 ms
main.css
470 ms
frontend.css
688 ms
styles.css
701 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
700 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
704 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
720 ms
frontend.min.css
742 ms
swiper.min.css
907 ms
e-swiper.min.css
922 ms
post-442.css
927 ms
she-header-style.css
933 ms
widget-heading.min.css
954 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
989 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
1132 ms
widget-image.min.css
1150 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1158 ms
post-540.css
1169 ms
post-939.css
1191 ms
post-845.css
1234 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1358 ms
widget-social-icons.min.css
1379 ms
brands.css
1356 ms
fontawesome.css
1370 ms
solid.css
1398 ms
general.min.css
1449 ms
wpr-animations.min.css
1552 ms
text-animations.min.css
1579 ms
frontend.min.css
1613 ms
all.min.css
1742 ms
css
57 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1759 ms
solid.min.css
1763 ms
regular.min.css
1781 ms
brands.min.css
1810 ms
smartslider.min.css
1852 ms
js
118 ms
bootstrap.min.css
112 ms
loader.js
70 ms
trustindex-google-widget.css
1858 ms
scc-c2.min.js
15 ms
widget-social-icons.min.css
1711 ms
apple-webkit.min.css
1541 ms
n2.min.js
1382 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
1409 ms
ss-simple.min.js
1444 ms
w-arrow-image.min.js
1453 ms
jquery.min.js
1457 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1507 ms
she-header.js
1384 ms
frontend.min.js
1620 ms
app.js
1631 ms
hooks.min.js
1627 ms
i18n.min.js
1607 ms
index.js
1622 ms
index.js
1478 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1459 ms
main.js
2053 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
2039 ms
slick.min.js
2017 ms
particles.js
1973 ms
jarallax.min.js
1851 ms
parallax.min.js
1828 ms
general.min.js
2137 ms
frontend.js
2113 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
2096 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2043 ms
core.min.js
1940 ms
frontend.min.js
1911 ms
frontend.min.js
1989 ms
modal-popups.min.js
1977 ms
ALV-UjWqpCBK2lBJKnE4tP4VAIhSvlpY5x_KZVXLtiDaDAsX8a3RstM=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
766 ms
logo-border.png
1748 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2024-07-25-at-5.27.12-PM.jpeg
2264 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-16-at-6.01.38-PM.jpeg
2309 ms
2-2.jpg
1753 ms
forestview3.jpg
1799 ms
image-26-scaled.jpeg
2713 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2022-11-22-at-3.55.21-PM.jpeg
2198 ms
ideal-location.jpg
1987 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-01-28-at-4.12.18-PM.jpeg
2251 ms
jsghckjx.jpeg
2450 ms
PREMIUM-LOUNGE.webp
2432 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-03-21-at-4.06.01-PM-10-min.jpeg
2489 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-03-21-at-5.28.13-PM-15-min.jpeg
2504 ms
3-1.jpg
2559 ms
ALV-UjWGt1CzM53ywUGQr0ha6j-pdX5CpWznc2u61OzTAGe9NIEnuq-2=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
1074 ms
ALV-UjWE7roT0xypvqFrirx-PDtM35iGcA64adHBwa6aoFfcMDYjZdQ=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
1075 ms
ALV-UjWAD6n2TLHm2ny01FUIvHdTxRlyTK58yf6mGF3sIFrVcTk0rZvdQQ=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
799 ms
ALV-UjWmjRJg9IhjIu9_kLRT3Hac6UXPjw5X2eBjsYVksV98GDgXdk1SRg=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
1073 ms
ACg8ocLjmnLfxWTOhy4XuR3E7Dx5To70Zq_OJLjalSzQX9MUGAg__A=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
799 ms
ACg8ocKdcQ9AVrEHf2V4pg2CXl-T9jGkoI47P_t0me7WtJTB9SAC=w64-h64-c-rp-mo-br100
799 ms
attraction_133_1.png
3045 ms
attraction_132_1.png
2821 ms
attraction_131_1.png
2866 ms
attraction_123_1.jpeg
2648 ms
attraction_124_1.png
2911 ms
attraction_125_1.png
3033 ms
IMG-2818-655x1024.jpg
2843 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
648 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
788 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
1029 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
923 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
1027 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
1029 ms
IMG-2828-655x1024.jpg
2999 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
614 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
2451 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2778 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
2782 ms
packages_image_3-qu6iu39x6r2xs37qy0rwc540dmsmbhkq6h7z6vwkug.jpeg
2781 ms
packages_image_7-qu6itxmw1qv7uffxuyc4x6j8tbkf1ayc5pb2b84xvs.jpeg
2806 ms
packages_image_2-qu6itxmw1qv7uffxuyc4x6j8tbkf1ayc5pb2b84xvs.jpeg
2812 ms
Group-13.png
2498 ms
Group-14.png
2506 ms
mobile-apps.png
2751 ms
bj-logo-1.png
2751 ms
14.jpg
2757 ms
HOTEL_FACILITIES.png
2818 ms
download.jpg
2533 ms
Mobiile-bg.png
2533 ms
royaleretreat.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
royaleretreat.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
royaleretreat.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royaleretreat.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royaleretreat.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royaleretreat.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royal E Retreat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: