Tools & Wizards About Us
royalprojects.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

royalprojects.in

Royal Projects Surat – Trusted Real Estate Developers for Luxury Living & Investment

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

444 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

265 ms

royalprojects.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Royal Projects content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about royalprojects.in

Discover Royal Projects – Surat’s top real estate developers since 1992. Explore premium residential and commercial properties. Book your visit now!

Visit royalprojects.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Royalprojects.in page load time and found that the first response time was 444 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royalprojects.in performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.135

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royalprojects.in

444 ms

stmenu.js

135 ms

jquery.min.js

7 ms

style.css

122 ms

anythingslider.css

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Royalprojects.in, 11% (8 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Royalprojects.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 523.6 kB (26%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royalprojects.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 68.9 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal Projects images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 428.1 kB

  • Original 712.4 kB
  • After minification 672.6 kB
  • After compression 284.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 428.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 35.6 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalprojects.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (55%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Projects. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royalprojects.in

royalprojects.in

444 ms

stmenu.js

stmenu.js

135 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

7 ms

style.css

style.css

122 ms

anythingslider.css

anythingslider.css

123 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

110 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js

131 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

109 ms

jquery.anythingslider.js

jquery.anythingslider.js

199 ms

bx_styles.css

bx_styles.css

357 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

379 ms

default.css

default.css

270 ms

jquery.bxSlider.min.js

jquery.bxSlider.min.js

220 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

245 ms

royal_main.js

royal_main.js

269 ms

element.js

element.js

35 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

60 ms

stcode.js

stcode.js

321 ms

ga.js

ga.js

44 ms

web_back.jpg

web_back.jpg

934 ms

social_icon.png

social_icon.png

391 ms

credial-logo.png

credial-logo.png

395 ms

colum_left_back_specer.jpg

colum_left_back_specer.jpg

344 ms

royal_project_logo.jpg

royal_project_logo.jpg

342 ms

link_between_line.jpg

link_between_line.jpg

367 ms

banner_01.jpg

banner_01.jpg

946 ms

banner_02.jpg

banner_02.jpg

800 ms

banner_03.jpg

banner_03.jpg

905 ms

manu_royal_enclave.jpg

manu_royal_enclave.jpg

497 ms

home_project_img.jpg

home_project_img.jpg

537 ms

manu_royal_platinum.jpg

manu_royal_platinum.jpg

816 ms

steffie.js

steffie.js

710 ms

steffrect.js

steffrect.js

960 ms

steffslip.js

steffslip.js

969 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

926 ms

01_current_projects.jpg

01_current_projects.jpg

956 ms

01_current_projects_over.jpg

01_current_projects_over.jpg

1153 ms

02_future_projects.jpg

02_future_projects.jpg

994 ms

02_future_projects_over.jpg

02_future_projects_over.jpg

1153 ms

03_past_projects.jpg

03_past_projects.jpg

1017 ms

03_past_projects_over.jpg

03_past_projects_over.jpg

1151 ms

majalla-webfont.woff

majalla-webfont.woff

1195 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

link_point.jpg

link_point.jpg

178 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

177 ms

bottom_right_back_specer.jpg

bottom_right_back_specer.jpg

188 ms

know_more_arrow.jpg

know_more_arrow.jpg

182 ms

translateelement.css

translateelement.css

59 ms

main.js

main.js

156 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

63 ms

lg-share-en.gif

lg-share-en.gif

15 ms

gray_prev.png

gray_prev.png

221 ms

gray_next.png

gray_next.png

222 ms

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html

47 ms

element_main.js

element_main.js

46 ms

translate_24dp.png

translate_24dp.png

34 ms

l

l

50 ms

cleardot.gif

cleardot.gif

45 ms

15 ms

pixel

pixel

21 ms

pixel

pixel

18 ms

pixel

pixel

21 ms

pixel

pixel

38 ms

pixel

pixel

25 ms

pixel

pixel

24 ms

pixel

pixel

24 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

match-result

match-result

7 ms

match-result

match-result

6 ms

match-result

match-result

6 ms

te_ctrl3.gif

te_ctrl3.gif

11 ms

match-result

match-result

42 ms

royalprojects.in

royalprojects.in

63 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

234 ms

Accessibility Review

royalprojects.in accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

royalprojects.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

royalprojects.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalprojects.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Royalprojects.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royalprojects.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royal Projects. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: