Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

rplreport.com

ChineSe直男Gay国产1068|久久精品这里只有|伊人久久大香线蕉av影院|99久久国产自偷自自偷免费一区

Page Load Speed

22.2 sec in total

First Response

376 ms

Resources Loaded

21.7 sec

Page Rendered

74 ms

rplreport.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rplreport content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rplreport.com

ChineSe直男Gay国产1068|久久精品这里只有|伊人久久大香线蕉av影院|99久久国产自偷自自偷免费一区|zayou亚洲福利一区|亚洲高清国产拍精品闺蜜合租|jizjizjizjiz日本护士出水

Visit rplreport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rplreport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 376 ms and then it took 21.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

rplreport.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

376 ms

push.js

780 ms

common.js

72 ms

tj.js

140 ms

0.gif

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rplreport.com, 22% (2 requests) were made to Sstatic1.histats.com and 22% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Api.share.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.9 kB

After Optimization

1.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rplreport.com main page is 2.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 601 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 608 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 601 B or 50% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 413 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 413 B or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (43%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rplreport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rplreport.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rplreport.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rplreport.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rplreport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rplreport.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rplreport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: