5.5 sec in total
546 ms
4.1 sec
911 ms
Welcome to rs-safety.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check RS Safety best content right away, or after learning these important things about rs-safety.co.uk
Visit rs-safety.co.ukWe analyzed Rs-safety.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 546 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rs-safety.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.075
95/100
15%
Value16.2 s
5/100
10%
546 ms
161 ms
156 ms
169 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Rs-safety.co.uk, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (901 ms) belongs to the original domain Rs-safety.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 149.0 kB (1%)
13.2 MB
13.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rs-safety.co.uk main page is 13.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RS Safety images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rs-safety.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (70%)
61
18
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RS Safety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rs-safety.co.uk
546 ms
styles.css
161 ms
nectar-slider.css
156 ms
font-awesome.min.css
169 ms
grid-system.css
230 ms
style.css
317 ms
element-testimonial.css
241 ms
element-fancy-box.css
249 ms
element-interactive-map.css
251 ms
element-fancy-unordered-list.css
253 ms
element-icon-with-text.css
304 ms
css
36 ms
responsive.css
361 ms
select2.css
360 ms
skin-material.css
365 ms
menu-dynamic.css
364 ms
js_composer.min.css
381 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
395 ms
style.css
438 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
523 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
446 ms
iconsmind-core.css
447 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
455 ms
core.css
470 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
517 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
612 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
613 ms
index.js
613 ms
anime.js
613 ms
nectar-slider.js
745 ms
jquery.easing.js
623 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
625 ms
priority.js
625 ms
transit.js
625 ms
waypoints.js
673 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
746 ms
hoverintent.js
758 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
845 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
682 ms
superfish.js
608 ms
init.js
840 ms
touchswipe.min.js
621 ms
select2.min.js
619 ms
wp-embed.min.js
610 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
609 ms
logo.png
382 ms
cieh-logo_white-268x118-452w.png
380 ms
iosh-logo.png
380 ms
new.jpg
501 ms
shutterstock_1943253289.jpg
809 ms
shutterstock_449130889.jpg
857 ms
shutterstock_1625517184.jpg
800 ms
shutterstock_1715767945.jpg
901 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedHFHGPc.woff
87 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlE92JQEk.woff
132 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7jujVj9w.woff
180 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff
194 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
196 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
196 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
195 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
226 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
545 ms
iconsmind.ttf
609 ms
home-01.jpg
175 ms
home-02.jpg
317 ms
home-safety-training-image.jpg
245 ms
home-safety-consulting.jpg
257 ms
home-risk-assessment-image.jpg
284 ms
testimonial-banner.jpg
488 ms
shutterstock_256122670.jpg
400 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
270 ms
rs-safety.co.uk accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rs-safety.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rs-safety.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rs-safety.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rs-safety.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rs-safety.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RS Safety. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: