Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

449 ms

Resources Loaded

7.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

rssonline.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rssonline.in homepage info - get ready to check Rssonline best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about rssonline.in

Visit rssonline.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rssonline.in page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rssonline.in performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.402

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rssonline.in

449 ms

rssonline.in

1247 ms

select2.min.css

461 ms

css2

39 ms

css2

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rssonline.in, 16% (11 requests) were made to Cloudzoot.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) relates to the external source Cloudzoot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 477.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

16.6 MB

After Optimization

16.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Rssonline.in main page is 16.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 16.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 123.6 kB

  • Original 137.0 kB
  • After minification 99.6 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 346.3 kB

  • Original 16.3 MB
  • After minification 15.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rssonline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 138.5 kB
  • After minification 138.5 kB
  • After compression 137.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB
  • After compression 64.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rssonline.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (34%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rssonline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rssonline.in accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rssonline.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rssonline.in SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rssonline.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is . Our system also found out that Rssonline.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rssonline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: