Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

rst.by

Ремонт ноутбуков в Минске. Ремонт компьютеров мониторов проектора ТСД Беларусь

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

648 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

166 ms

rst.by screenshot

About Website

Visit rst.by now to see the best up-to-date Rst content for Belarus and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rst.by

Ремонт ноутбуков компьютеров, отремонтировать ноутбук в Минске сервисный центр ремонт материнских плат ПК к...

Visit rst.by

Key Findings

We analyzed Rst.by page load time and found that the first response time was 648 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rst.by performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rst.by

648 ms

top100.jcn

376 ms

bgtotal.gif

158 ms

log.gif

315 ms

server.jpg

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Rst.by, 7% (2 requests) were made to Counter.rambler.ru and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (789 ms) belongs to the original domain Rst.by.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

64.8 kB

After Optimization

49.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rst.by main page is 64.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 24.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rst images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 24.0 kB
  • After minification 24.0 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (27%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rst. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rst.by accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

rst.by best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rst.by SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rst.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rst.by main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rst. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: