3.8 sec in total
399 ms
3.1 sec
388 ms
Visit rsupport.com now to see the best up-to-date RSUPPORT content for South Korea and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rsupport.com
RSUPPORT is Asia’s largest remote support solutions company, offering remote access services for Windows PC, Mac, as well as mobile.
Visit rsupport.comWe analyzed Rsupport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rsupport.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
399 ms
870 ms
427 ms
175 ms
251 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Rsupport.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (870 ms) belongs to the original domain Rsupport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (48%)
3.0 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rsupport.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RSUPPORT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 733.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 733.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 567.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rsupport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 567.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (57%)
60
26
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RSUPPORT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rsupport.com
399 ms
870 ms
custom.css
427 ms
custom-en.css
175 ms
layerslider.css
251 ms
css
23 ms
settings.css
355 ms
style.css
732 ms
font-awesome.css
342 ms
animations.css
411 ms
media.css
345 ms
jquery-ui.css
24 ms
jquery.ui.timepicker.css
428 ms
jquery.js
521 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
440 ms
greensock.js
573 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
586 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
513 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
708 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
863 ms
jquery.ui.timepicker.js
609 ms
css
13 ms
non-latin.js
405 ms
comment-reply.min.js
420 ms
modernizr-min.js
447 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
593 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
589 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
590 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
591 ms
main.js
667 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
608 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
665 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
664 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.min.js
665 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
819 ms
js-common.js
833 ms
custom.js
832 ms
analytics.js
78 ms
collect
230 ms
collect
213 ms
rsupport.svg
194 ms
main-slider-g4.jpg
344 ms
main-slider-g1.jpg
193 ms
main-slider-a02.jpg
346 ms
main-slide-g3.jpg
349 ms
main-business1.png
347 ms
main-business2.png
344 ms
main-business3.png
346 ms
main-business4.png
347 ms
main-11.png
405 ms
20160203main-2.png
348 ms
20160203main-3.png
349 ms
20160203bg-main-section2.png
403 ms
20160203main-partnership.png
426 ms
icon-sns.png
368 ms
icon-footer.png
368 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
169 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
399 ms
icomoon.woff
437 ms
loader.gif
149 ms
coloredbg.png
156 ms
shadow-top.png
90 ms
shadow-bottom.png
88 ms
rsupport.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rsupport.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rsupport.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rsupport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rsupport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rsupport.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RSUPPORT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: