Tools & Wizards About Us
rtcfencing.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rtcfencing.co.uk

Commercial Fencing in Leicester, Nottingham & Birmingham

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

448 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

739 ms

rtcfencing.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rtcfencing.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Rtc Fencing best content right away, or after learning these important things about rtcfencing.co.uk

We provide solutions for commercial fencing in Leicester & the surrounding areas. High-quality fencing at great prices! FREE Quotations

Visit rtcfencing.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtcfencing.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 448 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtcfencing.co.uk performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rtcfencing.co.uk

448 ms

style.min.css

96 ms

public-main.css

261 ms

style.css

192 ms

public-main.js

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Rtcfencing.co.uk, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (799 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtcfencing.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtcfencing.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 104.3 kB

  • Original 129.6 kB
  • After minification 125.0 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 134 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtc Fencing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 167.1 kB
  • After minification 167.1 kB
  • After compression 164.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 60.2 kB
  • After minification 60.2 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtcfencing.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (38%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtc Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rtcfencing.co.uk

www.rtcfencing.co.uk

448 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

96 ms

public-main.css

public-main.css

261 ms

style.css

style.css

192 ms

public-main.js

public-main.js

199 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

381 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

295 ms

reviews

reviews

420 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

jquery.main.js

jquery.main.js

292 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

298 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

299 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

360 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

360 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

359 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

375 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

415 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

529 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

528 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

531 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

537 ms

wpr-beacon.min.js

wpr-beacon.min.js

537 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

67 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

90 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

116 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

114 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

116 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

115 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

240 ms

select-bg.png

select-bg.png

264 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

257 ms

icon-quotes.png

icon-quotes.png

260 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf

32 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

58 ms

logo.png

logo.png

90 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

227 ms

client-logo01.png

client-logo01.png

94 ms

client-logo02.png

client-logo02.png

95 ms

client-logo03.png

client-logo03.png

93 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

227 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

228 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

228 ms

img7.jpg

img7.jpg

502 ms

railings-CTA.jpg

railings-CTA.jpg

504 ms

site-hoarding-CTA.jpg

site-hoarding-CTA.jpg

501 ms

Gates-CTA.jpg

Gates-CTA.jpg

503 ms

WoodenCTA.jpg

WoodenCTA.jpg

503 ms

SecurityFencingCTA.jpg

SecurityFencingCTA.jpg

503 ms

img8.jpg

img8.jpg

504 ms

icon01.svg

icon01.svg

504 ms

icon02.svg

icon02.svg

507 ms

icon03.svg

icon03.svg

509 ms

gmblogo.svg

gmblogo.svg

510 ms

3-17.jpg

3-17.jpg

702 ms

4-17.jpg

4-17.jpg

541 ms

img16.jpg

img16.jpg

557 ms

rtcvan.jpg

rtcvan.jpg

702 ms

img11.png

img11.png

556 ms

img12.png

img12.png

703 ms

img13.png

img13.png

701 ms

img14.png

img14.png

799 ms

img5.jpg

img5.jpg

797 ms

img6.jpg

img6.jpg

796 ms

img12.jpg

img12.jpg

797 ms

vtB2PcDRGjw

vtB2PcDRGjw

147 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

11 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

34 ms

base.js

base.js

74 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

179 ms

0o2vSHmH6ApOX27UzDeaY_GD7faOtklBjWYygVKryhI.js

0o2vSHmH6ApOX27UzDeaY_GD7faOtklBjWYygVKryhI.js

152 ms

embed.js

embed.js

56 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

40 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

39 ms

id

id

38 ms

Create

Create

105 ms

Accessibility Review

rtcfencing.co.uk accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rtcfencing.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rtcfencing.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtcfencing.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtcfencing.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtcfencing.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rtc Fencing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: