Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rthl.ru

RTHL 3.0

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

507 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

189 ms

rthl.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rthl.ru homepage info - get ready to check RTHL best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about rthl.ru

Visit rthl.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Rthl.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 507 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rthl.ru performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rthl.ru

507 ms

rthl.ru

1621 ms

css2

31 ms

3.0prozracnyj_Oen28.png

1253 ms

RTHL_9Hw7D.jpg

1392 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rthl.ru, 63% (10 requests) were made to Fs.mtgame.ru and 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Fs.mtgame.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.2 kB (22%)

Content Size

971.1 kB

After Optimization

753.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rthl.ru main page is 971.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 800.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 111.7 kB

  • Original 159.1 kB
  • After minification 158.6 kB
  • After compression 47.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 102.5 kB

  • Original 800.5 kB
  • After minification 698.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RTHL needs image optimization as it can save up to 102.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 11.5 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rthl.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTHL. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rthl.ru accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rthl.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rthl.ru SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rthl.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rthl.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RTHL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: