Tools & Wizards About Us
rtpl.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

rtpl.co.in

Rudraksha Technology Private Limited : Product Development Company in digital video technology

Page Load Speed

594 ms in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

368 ms

Page Rendered

105 ms

rtpl.co.in screenshot

About Website

Visit rtpl.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Rtpl content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtpl.co.in

RTPL provides innovative solutions in the areas of digital video technologies and custom software solutions for broadcasters

Visit rtpl.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtpl.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 473 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtpl.co.in performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtpl.co.in

121 ms

style.css

32 ms

layout.css

61 ms

rollover.js

60 ms

clogoslider.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rtpl.co.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (121 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtpl.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 42.2 kB (24%)

Content Size

173.3 kB

After Optimization

131.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rtpl.co.in main page is 173.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 123.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 120.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtpl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 23.1 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtpl.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (16%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtpl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtpl.co.in

rtpl.co.in

121 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

layout.css

layout.css

61 ms

rollover.js

rollover.js

60 ms

clogoslider.css

clogoslider.css

63 ms

clogoslider.js

clogoslider.js

63 ms

logo_slider.js

logo_slider.js

62 ms

AC_RunActiveContent.js

AC_RunActiveContent.js

65 ms

tall_top_rhs.gif

tall_top_rhs.gif

32 ms

tall_top.gif

tall_top.gif

31 ms

head1.jpg

head1.jpg

63 ms

mainmenu.jpg

mainmenu.jpg

32 ms

arrow_on.gif

arrow_on.gif

32 ms

Missing_movie.jpg

Missing_movie.jpg

33 ms

bg_box.jpg

bg_box.jpg

61 ms

fp3.png

fp3.png

117 ms

box_logger.png

box_logger.png

61 ms

disclaimer.html

disclaimer.html

61 ms

footer_marker.gif

footer_marker.gif

62 ms

fp2.png

fp2.png

31 ms

Accessibility Review

rtpl.co.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

rtpl.co.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rtpl.co.in SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtpl.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtpl.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtpl.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtpl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: