Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

rtsb.group

Home - RTSB is a leading railway operator along the Eurasian corridor.

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

674 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

878 ms

rtsb.group screenshot

About Website

Visit rtsb.group now to see the best up-to-date RTSB content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rtsb.group

RTSB is a leading operator for rail freight connecting Eurasia. Benefit from our experience in intermodal container logistics and block train operations.

Visit rtsb.group

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtsb.group page load time and found that the first response time was 674 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtsb.group performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,920 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtsb.group

674 ms

R_Group_black.png

137 ms

wp-embed.min.js

138 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

433 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

476 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Rtsb.group, 44% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 37% (15 requests) were made to Mlitppkqegoh.i.optimole.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtsb.group.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.2 kB (76%)

Content Size

151.1 kB

After Optimization

35.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Rtsb.group main page is 151.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 141.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 114.9 kB

  • Original 141.4 kB
  • After minification 137.9 kB
  • After compression 26.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 239 B

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTSB images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (67%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTSB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rtsb.group accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rtsb.group best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rtsb.group SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtsb.group can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtsb.group main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RTSB. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: