4.4 sec in total
817 ms
3.2 sec
351 ms
Click here to check amazing Rtvas content for Serbia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rtvas.rs
GLEDAJ TELEVIZIJUTV PREKO NETT PLUSASLUŠAJ RADIONARUČI USLUGU
Visit rtvas.rsWe analyzed Rtvas.rs page load time and found that the first response time was 817 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rtvas.rs performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value550 ms
53/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
51/100
10%
817 ms
97 ms
185 ms
184 ms
468 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Rtvas.rs, 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (817 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtvas.rs.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (48%)
2.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rtvas.rs main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 857.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rtvas images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 518.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 518.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 407.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtvas.rs needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 407.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (34%)
83
55
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtvas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rtvas.rs
817 ms
widgetkit-ac9367f4.css
97 ms
nsb.css
185 ms
module_default.css
184 ms
jquery.min.js
468 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
187 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
191 ms
widgetkit-e61714a3.js
288 ms
acymailing_module.js
365 ms
mootools-core.js
554 ms
core.js
278 ms
mootools-more.js
800 ms
bootstrap.min.js
489 ms
modthickrss.css
381 ms
distrib.min.js
459 ms
easybox.min.css
487 ms
bootstrap.css
664 ms
theme.css
613 ms
custom.css
600 ms
uikit.js
706 ms
autocomplete.js
642 ms
search.js
691 ms
tooltip.js
704 ms
social.js
734 ms
theme.js
754 ms
lightbox.js
454 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
457 ms
spotlight.js
450 ms
logo-as.png
627 ms
logo-as-mobilni.png
623 ms
blue.jpg
676 ms
primary_bottom.svg
627 ms
facebook_iph_24.png
625 ms
google_iph_24.png
628 ms
1-060b91051b.jpg
665 ms
1-b77f4ff788.jpg
629 ms
DSC_7029-22ff9c3ceb.jpg
630 ms
DSC_7031-af1f43c64c.jpg
631 ms
DSC_7033-e1ab9ce978.jpg
635 ms
DSC_7035-abb806d6dd.jpg
660 ms
DSC_7042-bb60e3a757.jpg
660 ms
DSC_7045-2c38095608.jpg
662 ms
DSC_7047-693bbf40d9.jpg
661 ms
DSC_7055-26a0190f52.jpg
663 ms
DSC_7068-43869e6f24.jpg
664 ms
DSC_7073-eb85f8275e.jpg
664 ms
DSC_7074-d592dbed1a.jpg
665 ms
DSC_7086-67f7a7039e.jpg
665 ms
DSC_7095-3f00bc5b32.jpg
665 ms
black0.png
666 ms
blackdot.png
667 ms
nbewolkt.png
667 ms
icon.png
668 ms
widgets.js
27 ms
yootheme.woff
629 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
772 ms
all.js
581 ms
slideshow.js
173 ms
widgets.js
109 ms
plusone.js
111 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
136 ms
primary_dark_bottom.svg
135 ms
bg.png
147 ms
close.png
134 ms
blank.gif
146 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
48 ms
131 ms
xd_arbiter.php
94 ms
xd_arbiter.php
147 ms
DSC_7029-04b554ad62.jpg
194 ms
DSC_7031-b69e77d146.jpg
146 ms
DSC_7033-a179459273.jpg
142 ms
DSC_7035-e4f60a8b32.jpg
702 ms
DSC_7042-41fec01e81.jpg
208 ms
DSC_7045-946bd415a7.jpg
251 ms
DSC_7047-7b2a1e2c1a.jpg
244 ms
DSC_7055-4e053ac1f8.jpg
250 ms
DSC_7068-1b0fe14d3b.jpg
376 ms
DSC_7073-a1b5634660.jpg
395 ms
DSC_7074-9d1e932dfc.jpg
352 ms
DSC_7086-2e229d9ff8.jpg
365 ms
DSC_7095-ab16ff11e7.jpg
437 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
39 ms
jot
84 ms
black9.png
99 ms
black40.png
113 ms
rtvas.rs accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rtvas.rs best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rtvas.rs SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SR
SR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtvas.rs can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Serbian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtvas.rs main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtvas.rs
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtvas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: