3.9 sec in total
747 ms
2.9 sec
286 ms
Welcome to rtwexpenses.com homepage info - get ready to check Rtwexpenses best content right away, or after learning these important things about rtwexpenses.com
Monthly expense tracking for a rtw trip. Learn to budget your own trip by following the spending patterns at Married with Luggage.
Visit rtwexpenses.comWe analyzed Rtwexpenses.com page load time and found that the first response time was 747 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rtwexpenses.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value3,180 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.236
53/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
747 ms
69 ms
134 ms
130 ms
137 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Rtwexpenses.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Stumbleupon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 567.8 kB (55%)
1.0 MB
458.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rtwexpenses.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 400.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rtwexpenses needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 254.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 264.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rtwexpenses.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 264.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (61%)
51
20
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rtwexpenses. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rtwexpenses.com
747 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
style.css
134 ms
diggdigg-style.css
130 ms
social_widget.css
137 ms
dashicons.min.css
194 ms
css
40 ms
jquery.js
193 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
136 ms
responsive-menu.js
213 ms
widgets.js
12 ms
plusone.js
78 ms
hostedbadge.php
1161 ms
diggdigg-floating-bar.js
245 ms
wp-embed.min.js
245 ms
ga.js
65 ms
db1d0380130c00136815c0ff5e5e40a8
75 ms
bg.png
142 ms
What-does-it-cost-to-150x150.png
242 ms
Average-cost-per-country.jpg
242 ms
Total-expenses.png
163 ms
Dream-Save-Do-FINAL-ebook-200x319.jpg
209 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
40 ms
cggfZ63q32E
105 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
37 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
74 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
76 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
75 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
75 ms
__utm.gif
44 ms
like.php
247 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
41 ms
www-embed-player.js
72 ms
base.js
104 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
48 ms
ad_status.js
46 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
313 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
347 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
33 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
121 ms
widgets.js
115 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
41 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
14 ms
fastbutton
112 ms
148 ms
postmessageRelay
64 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
25 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
35 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
43 ms
like.php
145 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
44 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
22 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
10 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
badge_su.js
141 ms
badges_su.css
144 ms
jot
83 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
83 ms
badgeRect50x60.png
73 ms
rtwexpenses.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
rtwexpenses.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rtwexpenses.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtwexpenses.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Rtwexpenses.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rtwexpenses.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rtwexpenses. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: