Tools & Wizards About Us
rtwlogistics.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rtwlogistics.net

Best freight forwarder & 3PL Logistics Company | RTW Logistics

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

427 ms

rtwlogistics.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RTW Logistics content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rtwlogistics.net

RTW logistics is the best 3pl logistics service provider company in India, USA, Indonesia, Singapore. Get Air Freight, Ocean Freight, Warehouse Services.

Visit rtwlogistics.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rtwlogistics.net page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rtwlogistics.net performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.092

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rtwlogistics.net

143 ms

rtwlogistics.net

424 ms

css

28 ms

rs6.css

137 ms

saswp-style.min.css

202 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Rtwlogistics.net, 17% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) belongs to the original domain Rtwlogistics.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 158.2 kB (19%)

Content Size

842.2 kB

After Optimization

684.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Rtwlogistics.net main page is 842.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 675.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 137.8 kB

  • Original 167.1 kB
  • After minification 162.2 kB
  • After compression 29.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 675.1 kB
  • After minification 654.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RTW Logistics images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (64%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RTW Logistics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 43 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rtwlogistics.net

rtwlogistics.net

143 ms

rtwlogistics.net

rtwlogistics.net

424 ms

css

css

28 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

137 ms

saswp-style.min.css

saswp-style.min.css

202 ms

ctc-style.css

ctc-style.css

203 ms

general.css

general.css

211 ms

shop.css

shop.css

214 ms

style.css

style.css

212 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

214 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

337 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

271 ms

post-5658.css

post-5658.css

278 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

480 ms

style.css

style.css

282 ms

global.css

global.css

279 ms

post-5634.css

post-5634.css

343 ms

post-973.css

post-973.css

353 ms

post-9.css

post-9.css

351 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

349 ms

elegant.min.css

elegant.min.css

402 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

404 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

422 ms

style.css

style.css

494 ms

aheto-style_0208.css

aheto-style_0208.css

420 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

471 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

476 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

497 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

543 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

656 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

623 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

625 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

622 ms

layout8.css

layout8.css

569 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

568 ms

styles.css

styles.css

679 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

679 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

679 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

677 ms

magnific.min.css

magnific.min.css

600 ms

cs_layout2.css

cs_layout2.css

552 ms

cs_layout2.css

cs_layout2.css

592 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

583 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

583 ms

cs_layout1.css

cs_layout1.css

581 ms

layout1.css

layout1.css

582 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

534 ms

layout1.css

layout1.css

586 ms

search.css

search.css

582 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

581 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

521 ms

rtw-video-c.jpg

rtw-video-c.jpg

519 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

46 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

98 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

122 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

125 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

124 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

124 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

122 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

119 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf

124 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf

126 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf

127 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVF9eL.ttf

131 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf

128 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf

128 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VF9eL.ttf

127 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVF9eL.ttf

129 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

76 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

115 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

403 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

619 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

529 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

422 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

278 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

269 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

334 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

342 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

382 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

369 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

373 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

392 ms

placeholder.jpg

placeholder.jpg

429 ms

ocean-freight-new.png

ocean-freight-new.png

237 ms

Trucking-1-241x241.png

Trucking-1-241x241.png

244 ms

RTW-logo-sky-blue-SVG.png

RTW-logo-sky-blue-SVG.png

194 ms

Warehousing-241x241.png

Warehousing-241x241.png

274 ms

icon-45.jpg

icon-45.jpg

231 ms

6.png

6.png

251 ms

final-300x195.png

final-300x195.png

208 ms

11a.png

11a.png

210 ms

05-Home-Split-720x540_2x.jpg

05-Home-Split-720x540_2x.jpg

280 ms

13.png

13.png

218 ms

rtwicon.png

rtwicon.png

239 ms

Accessibility Review

rtwlogistics.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rtwlogistics.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rtwlogistics.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rtwlogistics.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rtwlogistics.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rtwlogistics.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RTW Logistics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: