Tools & Wizards About Us
rudratechnocare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rudratechnocare.com

Page Load Speed

26.4 sec in total

First Response

4.6 sec

Resources Loaded

21.3 sec

Page Rendered

447 ms

rudratechnocare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rudratechnocare.com now to see the best up-to-date Rudratechnocare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rudratechnocare.com

Visit rudratechnocare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rudratechnocare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.6 sec and then it took 21.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rudratechnocare.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.051

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rudratechnocare.com

4615 ms

www.rudratechnocare.com

1450 ms

css

3994 ms

modernizr

933 ms

bootstrap.min.css

931 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Rudratechnocare.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Insights.techmahindra.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rudratechnocare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (68%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rudratechnocare.com main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 52.7 kB
  • After minification 38.3 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 179.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 899.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rudratechnocare needs image optimization as it can save up to 179.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 648.4 kB

  • Original 954.2 kB
  • After minification 865.0 kB
  • After compression 305.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 648.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 291.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rudratechnocare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (71%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rudratechnocare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rudratechnocare.com

rudratechnocare.com

4615 ms

www.rudratechnocare.com

www.rudratechnocare.com

1450 ms

css

css

3994 ms

modernizr

modernizr

933 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

931 ms

RUDRATECHNOCARE.styles.css

RUDRATECHNOCARE.styles.css

974 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

3136 ms

style.css

style.css

4993 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1187 ms

color.css

color.css

1165 ms

cssmtech.css

cssmtech.css

13510 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

2119 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

1930 ms

templatemo-ebook-landing.css

templatemo-ebook-landing.css

2175 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

82 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

71 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

99 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

106 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1957 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1997 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

2197 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

2510 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

2476 ms

appear.js

appear.js

2731 ms

wow.js

wow.js

2745 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

3883 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

3085 ms

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js

3001 ms

parallax-scroll.js

parallax-scroll.js

3237 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js

3339 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

3489 ms

script.js

script.js

3582 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

53 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

22 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

3823 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

4521 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

3811 ms

click-scroll.js

click-scroll.js

4057 ms

custom.js

custom.js

4054 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

4117 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

4285 ms

site.js

site.js

4286 ms

jquery

jquery

4826 ms

bootstrap

bootstrap

4518 ms

fontawesome-all.css

fontawesome-all.css

1226 ms

animate.css

animate.css

283 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

258 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

244 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

503 ms

rtl.css

rtl.css

522 ms

elpath.css

elpath.css

561 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

542 ms

odometer.min.css

odometer.min.css

740 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.css

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.css

758 ms

timePicker.css

timePicker.css

788 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

874 ms

rtclogo.png

rtclogo.png

315 ms

menu.svg

menu.svg

314 ms

logo-light.png

logo-light.png

316 ms

logo.png

logo.png

315 ms

icon-7__mapmarker.png

icon-7__mapmarker.png

315 ms

icon-8__envelop.png

icon-8__envelop.png

316 ms

icon-9__phone.png

icon-9__phone.png

465 ms

icon-10__clock.png

icon-10__clock.png

510 ms

shape-2.png

shape-2.png

491 ms

testi1chetak.jpg

testi1chetak.jpg

486 ms

testi5puja.jpg

testi5puja.jpg

494 ms

shape-11.png

shape-11.png

995 ms

icon-46.png

icon-46.png

698 ms

icon-47.png

icon-47.png

735 ms

icon-48.png

icon-48.png

742 ms

iso_logo.png

iso_logo.png

1698 ms

iso-27017-20151.png

iso-27017-20151.png

1469 ms

ISO_9001-2015_w.png

ISO_9001-2015_w.png

929 ms

msme.png

msme.png

994 ms

startupindia.png

startupindia.png

1231 ms

icon-map.png

icon-map.png

1162 ms

icon-mail.png

icon-mail.png

1226 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

1232 ms

instagram.svg

instagram.svg

1629 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

862 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1754 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1941 ms

flaticon_buildnox8aad.ttf

flaticon_buildnox8aad.ttf

1308 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1965 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1433 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

1638 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1881 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1589 ms

Accessibility Review

rudratechnocare.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rudratechnocare.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rudratechnocare.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rudratechnocare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rudratechnocare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rudratechnocare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rudratechnocare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: