Tools & Wizards About Us
rujip.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

rujip.net

るじんち

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

572 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

167 ms

rujip.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rujip.net now to see the best up-to-date Rujip content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rujip.net

エ　ヲ　カイタリ　ウゴクモノ　ヲ　ツクッタリ

Visit rujip.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rujip.net page load time and found that the first response time was 572 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rujip.net performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rujip.net

572 ms

styles.css

208 ms

8186670208_b1668acf21_q.jpg

168 ms

client-code.js

18 ms

jquery.min.js

516 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Rujip.net, 12% (2 requests) were made to Embedr.flickr.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Farm9.staticflickr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Rujip.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 138.4 kB (37%)

Content Size

371.8 kB

After Optimization

233.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rujip.net main page is 371.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 191.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 16.1 kB

  • Original 191.2 kB
  • After minification 175.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rujip images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 92.8 kB

  • Original 143.6 kB
  • After minification 143.4 kB
  • After compression 50.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 29.0 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rujip.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rujip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rujip.net

rujip.net

572 ms

styles.css

styles.css

208 ms

8186670208_b1668acf21_q.jpg

8186670208_b1668acf21_q.jpg

168 ms

client-code.js

client-code.js

18 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

516 ms

mt-theme-scale2.js

mt-theme-scale2.js

357 ms

kabe.png

kabe.png

706 ms

one.jpg

one.jpg

398 ms

twitterruji5.png

twitterruji5.png

382 ms

feed.gif

feed.gif

435 ms

embedr-loader.js

embedr-loader.js

59 ms

embedr-77cdfbadde15654081e0143481c549e8.js

embedr-77cdfbadde15654081e0143481c549e8.js

53 ms

yql

yql

64 ms

fpc.pl

fpc.pl

46 ms

base.css

base.css

349 ms

screen.css

screen.css

382 ms

201507201024768-thumb-1024x768-99.jpg

201507201024768-thumb-1024x768-99.jpg

820 ms

Accessibility Review

rujip.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rujip.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rujip.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rujip.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rujip.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rujip.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rujip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: