Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

19.4 sec in total

First Response

649 ms

Resources Loaded

14.4 sec

Page Rendered

4.4 sec

rumap.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rumap.net homepage info - get ready to check Rumap best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about rumap.net

Карты с номерами домов и улицами городов России. Москва, Петербург, Новосибирск, Екатеринбург, Новгород, Самара, Омск, Ростов, Сочи

Visit rumap.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rumap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 649 ms and then it took 18.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rumap.net performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rumap.net

649 ms

jquery.min.js

1125 ms

bootstrap.min.css

976 ms

style.css

328 ms

adsbygoogle.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Rumap.net, 5% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10 sec) belongs to the original domain Rumap.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 522.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Rumap.net main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 353.1 kB

  • Original 412.6 kB
  • After minification 381.5 kB
  • After compression 59.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 353.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 66.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rumap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 100.5 kB
  • After minification 100.4 kB
  • After compression 98.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 101.6 kB

  • Original 122.0 kB
  • After minification 119.1 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rumap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (19%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

85

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rumap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rumap.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

rumap.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rumap.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rumap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Rumap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rumap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: