Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

running101.co.uk

Running Tips, Training Advice, Gear Reviews & More at Running101

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

737 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

running101.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Running101 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about running101.co.uk

Informative articles on all things running, training advice, motivation, the latest running gear, & so much more here at Running101.

Visit running101.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Running101.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 737 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

running101.co.uk performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

running101.co.uk

737 ms

blocks.style.build.css

80 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

158 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

237 ms

front.min.css

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Running101.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Running101.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 220.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

7.4 MB

After Optimization

7.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Running101.co.uk main page is 7.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 104.7 kB

  • Original 126.4 kB
  • After minification 125.6 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 115.4 kB

  • Original 7.0 MB
  • After minification 6.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Running101 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 96 B

  • Original 254.1 kB
  • After minification 254.1 kB
  • After compression 254.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (30%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Running101. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

running101.co.uk accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

running101.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

running101.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Running101.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Running101.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Running101. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: